Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The POLST Paradigm: Pretty in Pink

By Walter Limehouse, M.D., Charles W. Henrichs, M.D., and Joel M. Geiderman, M.D. | on September 1, 2012 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Case: A 55-year-old woman with metastatic ovarian cancer is brought into your emergency department from home, unaccompanied, because of difficulty breathing and thick secretions that cannot be suctioned well. She is now unconscious, and her vital signs are BP 80/40; P115; RR 28; T 38C; spO2 85%. The medics show you a bright pink “physician order” form instructing you to provide comfort measures only. A physician – who is not on your medical staff but is from your state in a city 300 miles away – signed this fully executed form. Is this a valid order for you to follow, or should you intubate the patient?

You Might Also Like
  • Avoid Potential Pitfalls of Living Wills, DNR, and POLST with Checklists, Standardization
  • Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Paradigm Has Pitfalls
  • Quality and Safety Considerations for Patients With a POLST or Living Will
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 31 – No 09 – September 2012

The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Paradigm Program provides comprehensive, portable end-of-life physician orders that convey a patient’s wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment and resuscitation.

Starting with Oregon in 1991, more than 40 states have adopted these orders in various forms using various acronyms: POLST in Oregon and California, POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) in West Virginia, MOST (Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment) in North Carolina, MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) in New York, and others. These forms differ from other advance directives such as living wills in that they are physician orders enabled by state statutes or regulations, they are accepted by emergency medical services, and they are not hospital specific.

More thorough than a simple do not resuscitate or do not attempt resuscitation (DNR/DNAR) order, the POLST or similar form allows for decision making by the patient regarding resuscitation, hospital transfer, comfort measures, antibiotic use (in some states), and hydration and nutrition.

As described on the Oregon Health and Science University’s POLST Paradigm Program website (www.ohsu.edu/polst), a POLST form permits effective communication of patient wishes and documentation of medical orders, and carries an expectation that health care professionals will carefully follow these wishes.

Clinicians use POLST forms and similar orders for advance care planning for patients with progressive illnesses and a prognosis of less than 1 year of life expectancy.

Grounded within the ethical principle of autonomy, the patient (or designated decision maker) and a health care professional discuss the benefits and burdens of life-sustaining treatment so that the patient can make his or her wishes known regarding such treatment. These discussions should occur when there is sufficient time to cover the issues fully, not when the patient is in extremis.

The POLST form supplements (but does not supplant) other advance directives. While statutory advance directives require witnesses and often notarization, POLST forms only require the signatures of the patient (or appropriate surrogate) and a clinician to be valid. Physicians must sign the form in some states, while midlevel providers may sign the form in others. Arizona has no POLST program but permits patients, rather than physicians, to initiate and validate a prehospital advance directive without the signature of a physician or other health care provider.1

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Clinical GuidelineCritical CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianEthicsPain and Palliative CarePoliticsPractice ManagementPractice TrendsPublic PolicyResearch

Related

  • ACEP4U: Reinventing Research Education

    June 11, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • June 2025 News from the College

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “The POLST Paradigm: Pretty in Pink”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603