Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

2025 Physician Reimbursement Update

By Michael Granovsky, MD, FACEP | on October 9, 2024 | 1 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has released the 2025 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Proposed Rule, which will affect emergency medicine reimbursement significantly. Following a commentary period lasting until September 9, 2024, CMS is expected to issue its final PFS rule in early November, which will impact services beginning January 1, 2025.

You Might Also Like
  • Medicare’s Reimbursement Updates for 2024
  • 2017 Emergency Department Coding and Reimbursement Update
  • Emergency Medicine Gains Ground in 2021
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 10 – October 2024

2025 Work RVUs Hold Steady

Acting to protect the safety net, ACEP’s RVS Update Committee (RUC) members continually advocate for the recognition of the complexity of our day-to-day bedside care. The ACEP RUC team has been very successful in protecting our work RVUs.

2025 Total RVUs Small Possible Increase

Due to small potential increases in the calculation of Practice Expense, emergency medicine may see a roughly ½ percent increase in Total RVUs for certain key codes.

Click to enlarge.

The Medicare payment per RVU (the conversion factor) is unfortunately dependent on the AMA and the entire House of Medicine successfully convincing Congress to increase the budget for Medicare Part B, which governs payment for physician services. For 2025, CMS proposes a Medicare PFS conversion factor of $32.3562, a 2.8 percent decrease from the 2024 conversion factor of $33.2875. The 2025 proposed rule, as in past years, is subject to “budget neutrality,” a previously obscure factor which is becoming increasingly impactful. The 2024 budget neutrality adjustment was partially offset by 2.93 percent due to a funding patch passed by Congress through the Consolidated Appropriations Act. Unfortunately, the 2024 2.93 percent “patch” was only for one year and was not included in the 2025 proposed CMS calculations.

What Is Budget Neutrality?

The budget neutrality induced potential 2025 decrease is due to the CMS decision to increase reimbursement for the office visit codes back in 2021, a boon for urgent cares, which report physician services using office codes. Due to an historic clause in the payment and budgetary regulations, increases in Medicare part B spending beyond $20 million must be offset by decreases to the conversion factor to keep Medicare expenses in check. Unfairly, there is no indexing to inflation, so although expenses continually increase, Medicare payments are not keeping pace.

Due to the budget neutrality adjustment in the conversion factor, the whole House of Medicine could see a 2.8 percent decrease in payments per RVU for 2025. ACEP has mounted a vigorous campaign to protect the safety net and is urging Congress to stabilize the conversion factor for 2025 and index future physician reimbursement to inflation. 2025 Update to the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) represents a payment mechanism that provides for annual reimbursement adjustments related to quality program requirements impacting 2027 payments based on 2025 performance in four categories.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesMerit-Based Incentive Payment SystemMIPSPhysician Fee SchedulePractice ManagementReimbursement & CodingTelehealth

Related

  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Physicians of the Sandwich Generation Face Unique Challenges

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Texas Hospitals Now Must Ask About Immigration Status

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

One Response to “2025 Physician Reimbursement Update”

  1. October 20, 2024

    Stephen Epstein Reply

    A couple of the finer details (though Dr. Granovsky is the real expert here) –

    First, the MIPS Value Pathway for emergency medicine includes the “foundation layer” in which an EM group must choose a population health measure. The choice is between hospital-wide, 30-day, all-cause unplanned readmission rate or risk-standardized hospital admission rates for patients with multiple chronic conditions. Neither is a particularly good option.

    Second, the emergency medicine cost measure will be used for the first time this year and will comprise 30% of the overall MIPS score. While this new measure field-tested well, it throws another unknown into a group’s ability to predict how they will ultimately score on MIPS.

    Third, ACEP isn’t going alone on the advocacy front – the AMA has made a big push for an annual inflationary update to the physician fee schedule. Together, those efforts have led to a majority of the House of Representatives requesting action: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25210928-physician-fee-schedule-letter.

    Finally, we are awaiting the publication of the latest RAND study on the value of emergency medicine, which might also be beneficial in ACEP’s advocacy efforts for fair payment.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603