Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Quality and Safety Considerations for Patients With a POLST or Living Will

By Ferdinando L. Mirarchi, DO, FAAEM, FACEP, and Kate Aberger, MD, FACEP | on February 21, 2017 | 0 Comment
Uncategorized
  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

The National Academy of Sciences released its groundbreaking report on end-of-life (EOL) care, confirming EOL care is not only broken but accounts for $170 billion in annual spending. To make an impact, living wills (LWs) and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) are here to stay. Additionally, Medicare now reimburses for advance-care planning (ACP) conversations.

You Might Also Like
  • Avoid Potential Pitfalls of Living Wills, DNR, and POLST with Checklists, Standardization
  • The POLST Paradigm: Pretty in Pink
  • Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Paradigm Has Pitfalls

Physicians have tried to embrace LWs. More recently, the POLST paradigm has emerged to the national forefront. This growth has led to concerns that states cannot educate fast or well enough to ensure their safe and effective utilization. Both LWs and POLST are good documents. How they are applied by others in clinical situations, such as critical illness, has led to the unintended consequences of both over- and under-resuscitation. We have essentially introduced a new patient safety risk that has no quality oversight. We must recognize these risks and act to improve patient outcomes.

Can we accurately interpret POLST or LWs? Most LWs are created by attorneys years in advance of the onset of medical conditions. Often, POLST are completed by other providers (eg, social workers or registered nurses) and signed by physicians who may or may not have been involved in the conversation. So how do frontline emergency physicians interpret these during a brief interaction? Emergency physicians do not know these patients or families and have no established trust or rapport, yet within seconds they are expected to understand the patient’s wishes to either accept or decline lifesaving interventions based upon a form. “Full Code” appears understood. However, with a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order, things are less clear. With POLST, there are many combinations of treatment options, which make the water murkier.

The TRIAD studies have questioned whether providers understand what to do with LWs, DNR orders, and POLST. We need to figure out who is better off with a LW versus a POLST. We need to set quality standards and abide by them universally. More important, we need to standardize goals-of-care conversations so they are balanced and accurately predict the patient’s wishes. That information then will need to be conveyed to a totally different and disconnected medical provider in a safe and effective manner that ensures no risk to the patient.

Patient Resuscitation Card

Figure 1: Patient Resuscitation Card

This card directs the provider to a video testimonial outlining the patient’s resuscitation wishes. Providers can scan the card to see a video of the patient communicating his or her care wishes to providers in a clear and direct format rather than relying on complicated paper forms. The video password is 911.

At this time of escalating costs, are we also trampling on patients’ wishes? The pioneering work of Volandes, Wilson, and El-Jawahri has shown that educational videos can help patients make informed decisions about CPR. Could we then utilize patient video testimonials to help providers make informed medical decisions for patients in a safe and effective manner? Recently accepted for publication by the Journal of Patient Safety is the TRIAD VIII study. This was a multicenter evaluation to determine if patient video testimonials can safely help to ensure appropriate critical versus EOL care. We can now say that we can do things better to ensure we get it right for patients. Figure 1 is just an example of how we can bring patients back into the actual decision-making process.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: Living WIllPain & Palliative CarePalliative CarePatient SafetyPOLSTQualityQuality & Safety

Related

  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Waiting Room Medicine: The Ethical Conundrum

    March 9, 2025 - 2 Comments
  • The Business Aspects of Establishing a Novel Service Line in the Emergency Department

    February 11, 2025 - 2 Comments

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

No Responses to “Quality and Safety Considerations for Patients With a POLST or Living Will”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603