Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Interhospital Transfer Capabilities Still Pose Major Issues

By James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP | on June 14, 2024 | 0 Comment
Benchmarking
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Transferring patients from one ED to another hospital is an established part of emergency medicine practice. Patients who need inpatient services do not match the index hospitals’ capabilities, or the patient requests such a transfer, or the hospital has no available inpatient space. The rate of transfers was stable for many years, typically around 2 percent.

You Might Also Like
  • Ethical Issues in Interhospital Transfers of Emergency Department Patients
  • Readers Respond: Ethical Issues in Interhospital Transfers of ED Patients
  • Another COVID Casualty: the Emergency Department Transfer Process
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 06 – June 2024

Transfers have always been an area of concern to hospital administrators and emergency physicians. In 1986, Congress enacted the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) to ensure public access to emergency services regardless of ability to pay. Section 1867 of the Social Security Act imposes specific obligations on Medicare-participating hospitals that offer emergency services to provide a medical screening examination (MSE) when a request is made for examination or treatment for an emergency medical condition (EMC), including active labor, regardless of an individual’s ability to pay. Participating hospitals are then required to provide stabilizing treatment for patients with EMCs. If a hospital is unable to stabilize a patient within its capability, or if the patient requests, an appropriate transfer should be implemented. This law, along with many court rulings since its enactment, makes all patient transfers an area of review and concern.

Two years ago, an ACEP Now article covered the issue of transfer challenges resulting from early pandemic operations.1 As fresh challenges of the pandemic and hospital operations changed emergency medicine practice, one of the more challenging areas was the movement of admitted patients out of the first emergency department (ED). Many EDs have been unable to move admitted patients into appropriate inpatient beds in any hospital, and the result has been inpatients stacked in hallway beds in the ED.

A recent study from JAMA Network Open highlighted the issues of patient transfers, particularly for small rural hospitals.2 Their study was limited to 681 hospitals and characterized transfer patterns related to caseload-constrained hospitals. They reported concerns related to overcoming barriers to transferring patients in future surges.

Click to enlarge.

In fact, that study underestimated the ongoing challenges affecting patient transfers in U.S. emergency departments. Transfer rates are up across all types of EDs. In the last couple of years, EDs have transferred 3.2 percent of patients—twice the rate in 2010 (Table 1).

The data additionally show the ongoing transfer rate is higher in small volume EDs (4.7 percent). ED transfer rates vary dramatically by cohorts, increasing by nearly a factor of three for hospital-based EDs with decreasing volume (Table 2).

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: BoardingCrowdinginterhospital transfertransfer

Related

  • May 2025 News from the College

    May 6, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • February 2025 News from the College

    February 11, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • January 2025 News from the College

    December 30, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

No Responses to “Interhospital Transfer Capabilities Still Pose Major Issues”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603