Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Interhospital Transfer Capabilities Still Pose Major Issues

By James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP | on June 14, 2024 | 0 Comment
Benchmarking
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What Is the Burden of These Patients on EDs and Ambulance Providers?

You Might Also Like
  • Ethical Issues in Interhospital Transfers of Emergency Department Patients
  • Readers Respond: Ethical Issues in Interhospital Transfers of ED Patients
  • Another COVID Casualty: the Emergency Department Transfer Process
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 06 – June 2024

Click to enlarge.

The ED volumes seen in the U.S. in 2023 will be reported at around 160 million patients. At a 3.2 percent transfer rate, that is about 5.1 million patients being transferred in a year, or almost 14,000 patients a day. That patient movement stresses all types of hospitals and requires consideration of EMTALA requirements with each one. These tallies do not include freestanding EDs, which have an estimated transfer rate of about 7 percent.

This only represents ED transfers. Some hospitals also must transfer patients out of inpatient units when patient needs cannot be managed in the original hospital. This results in a significant caseload for ambulance transport services that provide the bulk of patient movement.

Moving Toward Solutions to Flow of Admitted and Transfer Patients

The management of admitted patients for prolonged periods of time is a current problem for all EDs. The issue of inpatient boarding compromising ED operations has been widely reported.3 The additional lengthy ED stays for transfer patients are equally resource-intense for emergency physicians and especially emergency nurses. Some hospital systems have developed transfer centers or flow centers, which attempt to coordinate patient movement to the best site of care within the system. But for independent, and particularly smaller and rural hospitals, the process of finding an accepting hospital for patients needing transfer is a huge burden that involves placing one phone call or digital request at a time. Once a patient is accepted somewhere, the facility must then begin the process of finding a transport resource, coordinating the right time of transfer with the receiving facility, and completing the required documentation.

This points to a need for centers that may specialize in regional patient movement, to include all hospitals and systems. In regions like San Antonio, Texas, this innovation has taken place already and serves needs across a large geographic region and many patient types (https://www.strac.org/). The state of Georgia has developed and funded a coordinating center for patient movement and EMS communications on hospital capabilities (https://georgiarcc.org/). These coordinating centers have been advantageous when patient surges occurred, such as those experienced during the most stressful days of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Emergency physicians have ongoing leadership opportunities in changing and regionalizing the acute care delivery system. The need to serve ED patients who must be transferred for ongoing care is an important management priority that was recognized widely during the pandemic and will continue into the future.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: BoardingCrowdinginterhospital transfertransfer

Related

  • Opinion: Demand Up, Beds Down—The Emergency Dept. Crowding Crisis

    June 17, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Dr. Joe Sachs and “The Pitt” Are Redefining Public Health Education Through Storytelling

    June 11, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP 2025 Leadership & Advocacy Conference—Showing Up on Behalf of EM!

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: June 2025 (Digital)

Read More

No Responses to “Interhospital Transfer Capabilities Still Pose Major Issues”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603