Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Emergency Medicine Quality Measures

By Richard Newell, Todd Slesinger, Dickson Cheung, Jennifer Wiler, Daniel Handel, Abhi Mehrotra, Rahul K. Khare, Lee E. Payne, Michael P. Phelan, Gary Zaid, Thomas B Pinson, and Jay Brenner | on September 1, 2012 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The OPPS rule for 2012 included eight new measures. Though the reporting requirement begins in 2012, the hospital payment update does not occur until 2013.

You Might Also Like
  • The State of Emergency Medicine Quality Measures
  • Proposed Measures on CT Scans Cause Concern
  • NQF Measures Join Growing List Of Quality Improvement Efforts
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 31 – No 09 – September 2012

For each of these measures, the patient population may vary significantly, ranging from any ED visit to only transfers. It is recommended that ED providers collaborate with their hospital’s quality departments to understand the outpatient measure populations. [continued online]

One particularly contentious measure worth noting is OP-15 – Use of Brain Computed Tomography (CT) in the Emergency Department for Atraumatic Headache. OP-15 will be the first measure that has been fast-tracked for inclusion into the OPPS program despite NQF rejection. ACEP through its Quality and Performance Committee has sent comments challenging this unprecedented path as well as the validity of this measure. A recent article has challenged the appropriateness of this outpatient imaging efficiency measure, which is based on Medicare administrative claims data. The study found that CMS data was only 17% accurate in assessing which patients should have received a CT scan in the ED setting; 83% should not have been labeled as inappropriate based on either ACEP clinical policy guidelines or expert consensus standards. Because CMS utilizes administrative claims data rather than a more thorough abstracting process as was performed in the study, hospitals’ performance on the new measure as reported by CMS did not match the true proportion of CTs with a documented clinical indication. The measure uses Medicare billing records to determine whether a CT scan was clinically appropriate. When the patients’ medical records were actually reviewed, they showed that 65% of the CT scans actually complied with Medicare’s measure and another 18% of patients had valid reasons for the CT scans documented in their charts. Medicare runs the risk of publicizing inaccurate information about clinical performance and rewarding/penalizing hospitals based on unreliable data.

Also of note, OP-19 was suspended by CMS due to concerns including, but not limited to, HIPAA. CMS is currently reworking the measure, and it is expected to return with slightly different measure specifications.

Inpatient Prospective Payment System

The IPPS describes the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, formerly known as the Reporting Hospital Quality Data for Annual Payment Update (RHQDAPU) Program. RHQDAPU was originally mandated by Section 501(b) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003. This section authorized CMS to pay hospitals that successfully report designated quality measures a higher annual update to their payment rates. To this end, CMS initially implemented a 0.4 percentage point reduction in the annual market basket for hospitals that did not successfully report. In 2005, the Deficit Reduction Act increased that reduction to 2.0 percentage points.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: ACAACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansCMSCost of Health CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianHealth Care ReformMedicarePoliticsPublic PolicyQuality

Related

  • Navigating the Health Care System in Vietnam with CKD/ESRD

    September 23, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • How Emergency Physicians Can Thrive in Value-Based Care Landscapes

    June 24, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP 2025 Leadership & Advocacy Conference—Showing Up on Behalf of EM!

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Emergency Medicine Quality Measures”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603