Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Emergency Medicine Quality Measures

By Richard Newell, Todd Slesinger, Dickson Cheung, Jennifer Wiler, Daniel Handel, Abhi Mehrotra, Rahul K. Khare, Lee E. Payne, Michael P. Phelan, Gary Zaid, Thomas B Pinson, and Jay Brenner | on September 1, 2012 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The goal of this article is to provide background on national quality measure reporting and reimbursement programs as well as updates regarding current, future, and retired quality measures relevant to the practice of emergency medicine.

You Might Also Like
  • The State of Emergency Medicine Quality Measures
  • Proposed Measures on CT Scans Cause Concern
  • NQF Measures Join Growing List Of Quality Improvement Efforts
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 31 – No 09 – September 2012

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) remains the dominant player in the determination of how hospitals and providers are reimbursed for quality. Currently, CMS is transitioning from a pay-for-reporting to a pay-for-performance system. The first step in this transition is value-based purchasing. CMS directs its influence through three main programs:

  • Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). Providers are responsible for reporting PQRS measures via claims through their billing companies. These measures include Medicare Part B patients only, but do include both admitted and discharged patients.
  • Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS). Hospitals are responsible for reporting these measures, which include all patients, regardless of payer, with a broad range of dispositions including admissions, transfers, and discharges.
  • Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS). Hospitals are responsible for reporting these measures, which include all admitted patients, regardless of payer.

Physician Quality Reporting System

The 2006 Tax Relief and Health Care Act (TRHCA) required the establishment of a physician quality reporting system, including an incentive payment for eligible professionals who satisfactorily submitted data on quality measures for covered professional services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries beginning in the 2007 reporting period. This CMS program was formerly known as the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI). In 2011, a name change occurred, and the program is now known as the Physician Quality Reporting System to denote that it is no longer a pilot but rather an established program. The title of the program, however, is a misnomer as the program applies not only to physicians but also to physician assistants and nurse practitioners.

Provider-based measures largely originate from the AMA-PCPI (Physician Consortium on Performance Improvement, convened by the American Medical Association). The current PQRS measures are listed in Table 1. For 2012, there were a large number of new measures, with seven that are relevant to emergency medicine. Pending National Quality Forum (NQF) measure review and the endorsement process, it is possible that some of the current PQRS measures will be retired. A number of proposed additional measures are being considered for future PQRS implementation such as confirmation of ETT, pediatric weight in kilograms, and ultrasound guidance of IJ CVC placement.

The schedule for additional financial incentives and penalties for reporting PQRS measures is outlined in Table 2.

Outpatient Prospective Payment System

Hospital measures can originate from individuals, professional societies, academic institutions, and more recently, consulting agencies such as Optimal Solutions Group and Ingenix. The bulk of hospital measures that affect emergency medicine (Table 3) come from the OPPS and its associated data reporting program, the Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program. The Hospital OQR Program was mandated by the 2006 TRHCA, which requires in Subsection (d) for hospitals to submit data on measures on the quality of care furnished by hospitals in outpatient settings. To receive the full annual payment update (APU) under the OPPS, hospitals must meet administrative, data collection and submission, and data validation requirements of the Hospital OQR Program. Hospitals that fail to successfully participate in the OQR receive reduced payments through a reduction of 2.0 percentage points to the hospital market basket update.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: ACAACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansCMSCost of Health CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianHealth Care ReformMedicarePoliticsPublic PolicyQuality

Related

  • EM Runs in the Family

    February 26, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • July 2024 News from the College

    July 6, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • June 2024 News from the College

    June 11, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

No Responses to “Emergency Medicine Quality Measures”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603