Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Pediatric Emergency Departments Should Screen for Sexually Transmitted Infections

By Marilynn Larkin (Reuters Health) | on March 31, 2016 | 0 Comment
Latest News
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Screening for sexually transmitted infections in a pediatric emergency department (PED) could help identify those who are infected despite lack of symptoms, researchers at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital in Ohio report.

You Might Also Like
  • Emergency Department Prescriptions for Treating Teens’ STIs Often Go Unfilled
  • Wide Variation in the Emergency Department for Testing, Treatment After Teen Sexual Assault
  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine Tips for Treating Closed Head Injuries and Using Antibiotics for Parotitis

“Adolescents and young adults 15 to 24 years of age represent approximately 25 percent of the sexually active US population, but account for half of all new sexually transmitted infection (STI) cases and have the highest incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhea (GC) among any sexually active age group. A large proportion of these infections are asymptomatic; thus, diagnosis and prompt treatment are vitally important to prevent transmission and long-term morbidity,” the researchers write in Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

To determine the proportions of GC and CT infections in asymptomatic adolescents in an academic urban PED, as well as patient-related predictors of screening refusals, the team recruited a convenience sample of patients aged 14 to 21 years presenting to the PED with nongenitourinary complaints. Patients were offered screening for GC and CT and asked to complete a questionnaire designed to identify barriers to screening.

A total of 719 (68 percent) of those approached participated. Nonwhites were more likely to agree to screening compared with whites (61.4 percent versus 38.6 percent) and were more likely to be publicly insured (63.3 percent) versus privately insured (29.3 percent) or uninsured (7.58 percent).

A total of 403 (56 percent) participants provided urine samples. Of those, 40 (9.9 percent) were positive for an STI. Controlling for other demographics, race was a significant predictor; the odds of testing positive for nonwhite participants were 5.90 times those of white participants.

Patients who refused testing were more likely to report not engaging in sexual activity (54.3 percent versus 42.4 percent) and less likely to perceive that they were at risk for STIs.

Coauthor Dr. Kari Schneider noted that Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines state that all sexually active adolescents should be screened yearly. “Adolescents seek care infrequently and so wherever/whenever they do, it should be considered a precious opportunity to screen,” she told Reuters Health by email.

Coauthor Dr. Jennifer Reed added that, “ideally, screening should occur in the primary care setting. But we know that adolescents in particular do not usually have regular well child checks or preventive care visits and often only seek care when they have an acute illness or injury. Therefore, it is important to take advantage of nontraditional settings, such as the ED, to promote screening.”

Dr. Reed currently has a grant that allows Cincinnati Children’s Hospital to offer universal GC and CT screening to all pediatric ED patients between the ages of 14 and 21.

“We are using a tablet to offer the screening to adolescents and are integrating their responses into our electronic medical record,” she told Reuters Health. “The goal is to reach those adolescents who are at high risk and otherwise would not have any opportunities to be screened for STIs.”

Echoing the authors’ advocacy of ED screening for adolescents, Dr. Mobeen H. Rathore, immediate past president of the American Academy of Pediatrics and chief, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology at the University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, told Reuters Health by email, “It’s not ideal for anybody to get their primary care in the emergency department. But until we fix the issue of primary care for everyone, not just children and adolescents, we need to make the best of the time and circumstances when we have access to our patients who are at high risk. We have to capture them when we can.”

Once acute problems have been addressed, the ED provides an opportunity “not just to test for STIs, but also to give vaccines and take other preventive measures,” Dr. Rathore continued. “Normally, we don’t want to think that routine care will be done in the ED, but in this population, we should do as much as we can.”

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Topics: ChlamydiaGonorrheaPediatricsScreeningSexually Transmitted DiseaseSexually Transmitted InfectionSTDSTI

Related

  • FACEPs in the Crowd: Dr. John Ludlow

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Nail Bed Injuries: What to Do—or Not to Do

    August 18, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Differential Diagnosis of an Infant with Easy Bleeding, Bruising

    August 14, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Pediatric Emergency Departments Should Screen for Sexually Transmitted Infections”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

Polls

Which topic would you like to see ACEP Now tackle?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603