Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Legal
      • Operations
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Compensation Reports
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • By the Numbers
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • mTBI Resource Center
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • Issue Archives
  • Archives
    • Brief19
    • Coding Wizard
    • Images in EM
    • Care Team
    • Quality & Safety
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Is Video or Direct Laryngoscopy Better for Intubation in Trauma Patients?

By Ken Milne, MD | on August 14, 2014 | 0 Comment
Skeptics' Guide to EM
Share:  Print-Friendly Version
Is Video or Direct Laryngoscopy Better for Intubation in Trauma Patients?

The treating physicians knew the treatment assignments, but this is not a concern because it is not possible to blind the clinicians given that VL and DL are different procedures that require different equipment.

You Might Also Like
  • Keep Video Laryngoscope Clear with IV Tubing, Saline, and Some Ingenuity
  • Videolaryngoscope Helps Residents Learn Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation
  • Timing Resuscitation Sequence Intubation for Critically Ill Patients
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 08 – August 2014

The strengths include that it was a randomized trial, all patients were followed up for the primary endpoint, and the study used video to record the resuscitation to avoid any bias inherent in a chart review.

The Bottom Line

VL leads to the same outcome as DL in trauma patients. VL takes longer to accomplish and may be associated with higher mortality in patients with severe head injuries. However, this relationship will require more study to confirm.

Case Resolution

You decide to use the GlideScope in this case because you feel that it might be better since the patient is in a cervical collar. Knowing that it may take a little longer to pass the tube, you make sure to properly pre-oxygenate the patient with high-flow oxygen with a non-rebreather mask at 30 to 60 liters per minute and use a nasal cannula set at 15 liters per minute kept on during your intubation attempt. You get an excellent view with the GlideScope and pass the tube on your first attempt.

Thank you to Dr. Steve Carroll from EM Basic for his help on this review.

Remember to be skeptical of anything you learn, even if you learned it from the Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine.

References

  1. Levitan RM, Heitz JW, Sweeney M, Cooper RM. The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:240-247.
  2. Weingart SD1, Levitan RM. Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59:165-175.e1.

Dr. MilneDr. Milne is chief of emergency medicine and chief of staff at South Huron Hospital, Ontario, Canada. He is on the Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine faculty and is creator of the knowledge translation project the Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine (www.TheSGEM.com).

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: AirwayCritical CareDirect LaryngoscopeEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianPractice ManagementPractice TrendsProcedures and SkillsVideo Laryngoscope

Related

  • Phenylephrine and Epinephrine Push-Dose Vasopressors

    February 10, 2026 - 0 Comment
  • Despite Drawbacks, Emergency Medicine Remains a Great Specialty

    January 9, 2026 - 1 Comment
  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Read More

About the Author

Ken Milne, MD

Ken Milne, MD, is chief of emergency medicine and chief of staff at South Huron Hospital, Ontario, Canada. He is on the Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine faculty and is creator of the knowledge translation project the Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine.

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Is Video or Direct Laryngoscopy Better for Intubation in Trauma Patients?”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*



Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603