Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The Latest Emergency Department Utilization Numbers Are In

By James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP | on October 20, 2019 | 0 Comment
Benchmarking Alliance
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Why Do They Come?

The acuity of visits to the emergency department continues to increase, with a mere 4.3 percent of ED visits classified as non-urgent (the highest rates of these visits were for patients under age 15).

You Might Also Like
  • Emergency Department Volume Increase Trend Continues Into 2014
  • Long-Term Trends in Emergency Department Visits, Patient Care Highlighted in National Reports
  • 2015 Emergency Department Survey Shows Spike in Volume, Structural Changes, Patient Boarding Concerns
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 38 – No 10 – October 2019

The reasons for visits were coded using a classification system developed by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. The NHAMCS includes a set of tables that relate to that classification, and estimates are presented by age and sex. Injuries accounted for an estimated 42.2 million visits, or 29 percent of ED visits. By comparison, in 2009 there were an estimated 45 million encounters for injuries. This trend reflects the success of many injury prevention programs, leading to an ED population distribution that features less injury and more illness.

The leading causes of injury, poisoning, and adverse effect–related ED visits were falls (10.5 million visits, or 23 percent of total injury visits) and motor vehicle traffic crashes (3.7 million visits, or 8.1 percent of total injury visits).

When viewed through the lens of “presenting complaint,” stomach and abdominal pain were the most common in 2016, accounting for around 9 percent of visits. Chest pain was next highest at 5 percent.

There were 5.5 million visits with a primary diagnosis of mental disorder noted in the emergency departments, of which 2.4 million visits included evaluation by a mental health provider.

Quality Performance Measures

Roughly 3.2 million visits resulted in the patient leaving before treatment was complete, or about 2.2 percent of all ED visits.

There are hospital quality indicators related to ED revisits and hospital readmissions that ED leaders must be aware of. About 2.7 percent of visits were made by patients who had been seen in the same emergency department in the preceding 72 hours (down from an estimate of 5.7 percent in 2015), and the CDC estimates 4.9 percent of ED visits were for follow-up.

The CDC report in 2011 indicated 6.3 percent of patients admitted through emergency departments had been discharged from a hospital in the preceding seven days. In 2016, roughly 2.9 percent of ED visits that led to hospital admission were patients who had been in an emergency department within the prior 72 hours. That number is down from 4.7 percent in 2011.

There is an ongoing increase in the use of diagnostic tools in the emergency departments, especially ECGs. The use of CT scanning appears to have plateaued, but the use MRI and other special imaging procedures (such as ultrasound) is increasing.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Centers for Disease Control and PreventionEmergency Department Benchmarking AllianceUtilization

Related

  • A Sobering Year for Emergency Departments and Their Patients

    December 11, 2023 - 0 Comment
  • A First Look at Emergency Department Data for 2022

    June 7, 2023 - 1 Comment
  • Emergency Department Patient Challenges to Come

    November 11, 2022 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP

James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP, is national director of prehospital strategy for US Acute Care Solutions in Canton, Ohio; clinical professor of emergency medicine at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio; and vice president of the Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance.

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “The Latest Emergency Department Utilization Numbers Are In”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603