Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The Hospital Geographic Zone Debate Pendulum Is Swinging Back

By Shari Welch, MD, FACEP; John vasquez, md | on April 18, 2022 | 0 Comment
Practice Management Special OPs
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Getty Images
FIGURE 1: Conceptual model depicting impact of geographical localization of general medical teams on quality of care. Mediating factors that lead to better quality of care are described in blue boxes. Mediating factors that are unintended and lead to worsening quality of care are described in grey boxes. The impact on domains of quality of care is described in pink boxes. ‘↑’ indicates an increase; ‘↓’ indicates a decrease; IDR = Interdisciplinary Rounds.

You Might Also Like
  • Geography: The Basics
  • How Did University Hospital in San Antonio Reduce ED Boarding?
  • Careful Planning and Innovation Helped Washington Hospital Move Its Emergency Department
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 41 – No 04 – April 2022

(click for larger image)

FIGURE 1: Conceptual model depicting impact of geographical localization of general medical teams on quality of care. Mediating factors that lead to better quality of care are described in blue boxes. Mediating factors that are unintended and lead to worsening quality of care are described in grey boxes. The impact on domains of quality of care is described in pink boxes. ‘↑’ indicates an increase; ‘↓’ indicates a decrease; IDR = Interdisciplinary Rounds.

Singh S, Fletcher KE. A qualitative evaluation of geographical localization of hospitalists: how unintended consequences may impact quality. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(7):1009-1016.

Geographic localization has been coupled with another innovation: separating the admitting role and the rounding role for hospitalists. Thus, the “triagist” role was born: One hospitalist will admit a patient (the triagist), while another subsequently manages care. Separating these roles improved efficiency and throughput.9 The triagist role allows the patient to be admitted in a timely fashion, and placed on the right unit and team later on. Another related improvement has been the multidisciplinary rounds, particularly those that focus on the discharge of the patient. Geography makes those team rounds more feasible. 10

Another strategy which optimizes hospital throughput involves adjusting the work schedules of hospitalists.11 Schedules that promote continuity were associated with lower mortality, lower readmission rates, higher rates of discharge to home and lower 30-day post discharge Medicare costs.12-13

Strategies that help reduce hospital length of stay and improve discharge efficiency and ultimately reduce boarding in the emergency department. Emergency physicians know first-hand the advantages in communication and workflow as most of us work in designated zones and lead care teams dedicated to the patients placed in a particular geographic area.

When hospitalists consider the “geography” question, we can bring an understanding of the issue both in the inpatient and ED universes. Supporting geographic localization strategy helps improve inpatient throughput help create open inpatient beds. And open beds are the only solution to the problem of emergency department boarding!


DR. WELCH has been a practicing emergency physician for over thirty years. She has written numerous articles and three books on ED quality, safety, and efficiency. She is a consultant with Quality Matters Consulting, and her expertise is in ED operations.

DR. VASQUEZ is an Assistant Professor of Medicine at Emory University. of Operations for the Division of Hospitalist Medicine at Emory. He writes a Hospitalist Medicine Blog focused on operational excellence.

References

  1. Bryson C, Boynton G, Stepczynski A ,et al. Geographical assignment of hospitalists in an urban teaching hospital: feasibility and impact on efficiency and provider satisfaction. Hosp Pract (1995). 2017;45(4):135-142.
  2. Singh S, Tarima S, Rana V, et al. Impact of localizing general medical teams to a single nursing unit. J Hosp Med. 2012;7(7):551-556.
  3. Mirabella AC, McAmis NE, Kiassat C, et al. Preferences to improve rounding efficiency amongst hospitalist: a survey analysis. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021;11(4):501-506. Mirabella AC, McAmis NE, Kiassat C, et al. Preferences to improve rounding efficiency amongst hospitalist: a survey analysis. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021;11(4):501-506.
  4. Huang KTL, Minahan J, Brita-Rossi P, et al. All together now: impact of a regionalization and bedside rounding initiative on the efficiency and inclusiveness of clinical rounds. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(3):150-156.
  5. O’Leary KJ, Wayne DB, Landler MP, et al. Impact of localizing physicians to hospital units on nurse-physician communication and agreement on the plan of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(11):1223-1227.
  6. Williams A, DeMott C, Whicker S, et al. The impact of resident geographic rounding on rapid responses. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(7):1077-1078.
  7. Klein AJ, Veet C, Lu A, et al. The effect of geographic cohorting of inpatient teaching services on patient outcomes and resident experience [published online ahead of print January 24, 2022]. J Gen Intern Med.
  8. Singh S, Fletcher KE. A qualitative evaluation of geographical localization of hospitalists: how unintended consequences may impact quality. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(7):1009-1016.
  9. Coates E, Quisenberry E, Williams B, et al. Focusing hospitalist roles on either admitting or rounding facilitates unit-based assignment and is associated with improved discharge efficiency. Hosp Pract (1995). 2021;49(5):371-375.
  10. Ibrahim H, Harhara T, Athar S, Nair SC, Kamour AM. Multi-Disciplinary Discharge Coordination Team to Overcome Discharge Barriers and Address the Risk of Delayed Discharges. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Feb 2;15:141-149.
  11. Wells M, Coates E, Williams B, et al. Restructuring hospitalist work schedules to improve care timeliness and efficiency. BMJ Open Qual. 2017;6(2):e000028.
  12. van Walraven C. The influence of hospitalist continuity on the likelihood of patient discharge in general medicine patients. J Hosp Med. 2018;13(10):692-694.
  13. Goodwin JS, Shuang Li, Yong-Fang K. Association of the work schedules of hospitalists with patient outcomes of hospitalization. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(2):215-222.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: geographic localizationgeographic zonesPatient Flow

Related

  • Pediatric Patients in Acute Mental Health Crisis Face Long Waits

    August 29, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Hospital at Home Is Here: An Opportunity EM Can’t Ignore

    August 25, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Management of ED Crowding versus Mass Casualty Incidents: Is There an Ethical Difference?

    August 4, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “The Hospital Geographic Zone Debate Pendulum Is Swinging Back”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603