It is well-recognized that delays in inpatient discharges result in ED boarding of admitted patients. Boarding has a negative impact on ED performance, clinical outcomes, and mortality. Improving the admissions process and decreasing the time patients spend in the emergency department after the decision has been made to admit have a downstream effect on decreasing inpatient length of stay (LOS). Like boarding, discharge delays are associated with increased mortality and adverse events.
Explore This IssueACEP Now: Vol 38 – No 10 – October 2019
The University Hospital (UHS) in the University of Texas-San Antonio health system had conducted a comprehensive ED improvement project, which dramatically improved door-to-doctor (D2D) times and LOS. Walkaways were reduced, and patient satisfaction soared as the timeliness of care was improved. Then the ED leaders—Andrew Muck, MD, and Steven Moore, MD—turned to the hospital for relief from high boarding levels. Their message was simple and powerful: “We fixed our house. Now can you help us with boarding?”
On the heels of the success in the emergency department, hospital leadership responded to this request favorably. They set out to increase inpatient capacity by improving discharge by noon (DBN). Note that DBN is measured as the percent of discharged patients out of beds by noon, not merely those who have a discharge order. Most hospitals experience discharge delays because discharge processes have become complex, are poorly articulated, and are not well synchronized. Things that must happen before a patient goes home often occur in a random fashion, and task roles are unclear. This frequently results in patients leaving the hospital later in the day, long after the ED demand for inpatient beds has risen. This, above all, causes boarding.
Communication around discharge is also haphazard. Common barriers to early discharge include transportation, physical therapy, follow-up appointments, durable medical equipment, medications, and education. Coordinating all of these elements understandably proves challenging on the inpatient side.
Cooperation and Coordination
The improvement initiative at UHS (dubbed “Power Through!”) focused on the discharge process itself, with a goal of increasing DBN without increasing LOS. The team began in the fall of 2018 with a kickoff lecture by Katherine Hochman, MD, of New York University Medical Center in New York City, who has published her successful work. She was able to alleviate boarding by increasing early discharges from the inpatient hospitalist units. UHS asked each unit and service to address the process of discharge on their units, the communication around discharges, and tools necessary to facilitate that discharge (see Figure 1). A key element in Dr. Hochman’s work and the work at UHS was “discharge rounding”—the implementation of brief discharge-focused rounds that coordinate the discharge of a patient a day or two in advance of an anticipated discharge. Getting ahead of the discharge process and communicating about the discharge to all stakeholders were critical to the project’s success.