Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The 20 Numbers of Emergency Department Management

By James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP | on March 17, 2020 | 0 Comment
Benchmarking
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Using Your Data to Improve Your ED

The first, and most important, use of data is to inform the ED staff about the patients they serve and the key performance indicators for that emergency department. Table 2 is a sample staff information chart. These “patient per day” measures are the basis for effective ED management and should be posted in the staff lounge and bathroom (the most important communication site in most emergency departments). Smart ED leaders also understand what measures change on certain days (Monday in most emergency departments) and will recognize that staffing and operational changes are needed for days where predictable patient surges will occur.

You Might Also Like
  • The Latest Emergency Department Utilization Numbers Are In
  • 2015 Emergency Department Survey Shows Spike in Volume, Structural Changes, Patient Boarding Concerns
  • Emergency Department Benchmarking Trend Data Help Physicians Anticipate Operational Management Needs
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 39 – No 03 – March 2020

Table 1: ED Performance Management Measures

1. Patients per day (the most important driver of ED operations)
2. Percentage of pediatric patients, defined as under age 18
3. Percentage of high-acuity patients, defined as physician CPT code level 99284, 99285, and 99291
4. Percentage of patients arriving by EMS 
5. Percentage of EMS patients admitted
6. Median time from door to doctor
7. Median length of stay for all patients
8. Median length of stay for treat-and-release patients
9. Median length of stay for admitted patients
10. Median “boarding time” (decision to admit until admitted patient leaves the ED)
11. Percentage of patients who leave before treatment complete (an important and inclusive term, counting any patient who leaves at any time in the ED process)
12. Number of ECGs per 100 patients seen
13. Number of images per 100 patients seen
a. CT scans 
b. MRI scans 
c. Ultrasound studies
14. Percentage of patients placed in an inpatient unit, either full admission or observation
15. Percentage of total hospital admissions processed through the ED 
16. Percentage of patients transferred to another hospital
17. Patient experience-of-care scores
18. ED staff satisfaction, measured by personnel turnover rate
19. Revenue per patient for the ED
20. For ED patients who are admitted, the financial contribution to hospital per patient

Note: The definitions of these data points are in the literature.2 The process for analysis of these data is summarized in an article by Shari Welch, MD, FACEP, and in ongoing Benchmarking and Special Ops articles in ACEP Now.4

The personnel and financial descriptors of acuity and the ED service are often shared at department meetings but not on a public chart. Those ultimately reflect on the longevity of ED managers. If ED staff and patient satisfaction are not high, a new group of managers may be analyzing the measures at future staff meetings.

The 20 numbers concept is used in other industries. The performance literature from other industries can be applied to some ED operations, but administrative decisions that affect ED performance must be driven by the demand for high-quality care and patient safety. The 20 numbers provide data to measure the successful execution of the emergency care mission. 

Table 2: A Day in Our ED

140 Patients to be seen
17 Are under age 18 
30 Are seen in and dispositioned from the fast track or greeting area
105 Are high-acuity
25 Arrive by EMS; of those, 11 are admitted
2 Are seen and then transferred to another hospital
172 minutes The average length of stay for all patients
290 minutes The average length of stay for patients being admitted, of which 120 minutes is boarding time
90 Are administered medications
3 Need some form of restraint, and seven need mental health management
43 Have an ECG performed
115 Imaging procedures will be done, of which 60 are plain films, 36 are CT scans, two are MRIs, and 10 are ultrasounds
30 Are placed in an inpatient unit, either full admission or observation, representing 70 percent of the 43 patients placed in inpatient units in a day
4 Will be transferred
1125 Orders will be entered via computerized physician order entry (CPOE)—eight orders per patient
0.22 Of the hospital’s total CPOE orders each day come from the ED
0.87 Patient experience score for the year to date
0.01 Left before treatment complete rate for the year to date

References

  1. Rui P, Kang K, Ashman JJ. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2016 emergency department summary tables. 2016. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website.
  2. Wiler JL, Welch S, Pines J, et al. Emergency department performance measures updates: proceedings of the 2014 Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance consensus summit. Acad Emerg Med. 2015:22(5):542-553.
  3. 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory – USA. Emergency Medicine Network website.
  4. Welch SJ, Augustine JJ, Dong L, et al. Volume-related differences in ED performance. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012:38(9):395-402.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: DataEDBAEmergency Department Benchmarking AlliancePractice ManagementVolume

Related

  • Florida Emergency Department Adds Medication-Dispensing Kiosk

    November 7, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • How Does Emergency Medicine Navigate Consolidation Trends in Health Care?

    October 29, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP

James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP, is national director of prehospital strategy for US Acute Care Solutions in Canton, Ohio; clinical professor of emergency medicine at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio; and vice president of the Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance.

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “The 20 Numbers of Emergency Department Management”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603