Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Statistical Trends of Diagnostic Testing in the Emergency Department

By James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP | on February 19, 2021 | 1 Comment
Benchmarking
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

References

  1. Yiadom MYAB, Napoli A, Granovsky M, et al. Managing and measuring emergency department care: results of the fourth Emergency Department Benchmarking Definitions Summit. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(7):600-611.
  2. Augustine JJ. Diagnostic testing in the ED supports development of new metrics as quality indicators. ACEP Now. 2017;34(7):21-22.

You Might Also Like
  • Expanded Diagnostic Testing in the Emergency Department Raises Need for Cohort Data
  • Diagnostic Testing in the ED Supports Development of New Metrics as Quality Indicators
  • Diagnostic Testing Usage Data Can Help Emergency Physicians Manage Utilization
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 40 – No 02 – February 2021

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Diagnostic TestingEmergency Department trendsImaging & UltrasoundStatistics

Related

  • ACEP’s October 2025 Poll: How Often Do You Read Your Own X-Rays?

    September 30, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Rapid Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Dissection with POCUS

    June 11, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • How Well Does Ultrasound Detect Volvulus in Infants?

    September 5, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP

James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP, is national director of prehospital strategy for US Acute Care Solutions in Canton, Ohio; clinical professor of emergency medicine at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio; and vice president of the Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance.

View this author's posts »

One Response to “Statistical Trends of Diagnostic Testing in the Emergency Department”

  1. August 25, 2022

    Kevin Flaig M.D. Reply

    Hi James,

    I am an Emergency Medical Director in an Emergency department which sees approximately 50,000 per year. Our CT Utilisation is reported to be approximately 45 per 100. Our radiology colleagues have not noticed overutilization and it seems like we our ordering appropriately. I can’t believe our acuity is that much higher but I am not sure I have an answer to this issue.

    What would be your interpretation of this? What should I do as a director to look into this?

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603