Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Diagnostic Testing Usage Data Can Help Emergency Physicians Manage Utilization

By James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP | on April 14, 2015 | 2 Comments
Benchmarking
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Diagnostic testing options available to emergency physicians continue to expand. The conflicts over the use and cost of testing have spilled over into the popular press and have generated questions from the radiologists who provide many of the interpretations of the images ordered in the emergency department.1 Managing expensive diagnostic testing in the ED is one element of the value that emergency physicians bring to the American health system. It is important that all ED physician leaders understand the data on imaging rates to adequately address resource utilization queries and better manage their departments.

You Might Also Like
  • Expanded Diagnostic Testing in the Emergency Department Raises Need for Cohort Data
  • Diagnostic Testing in the ED Supports Development of New Metrics as Quality Indicators
  • Emergency Department Usage Trend Data Can Help Physicians Prepare for Patients
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 34 – No 04 – April 2015

The ED has a critical and growing role as the diagnostic center for the medical community. This role is particularly important for patients who are being evaluated for potential admission to the hospital due to an acute-onset injury or illness. Because 68 percent of inpatients are processed through the ED, emergency physicians are responsible for a disproportionate share of diagnostic testing and the patient-flow issues related to it.

Diagnostic testing has changed markedly over the last 20 years, with the advent of imaging technology using a broad range of modalities (ultrasound, ionizing radiation, magnetic resonance, positron emissions, etc.). These remarkable tools provide unprecedented ability to evaluate patients as they present with a wide range of clinical problems.

There are two sources of data related to the utilization of diagnostic imaging in the ED over the last decades. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) gathers and reports data through the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). NHAMCS data from the CDC are available from 1992 through 2011, the last available year. The Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance (EDBA) uses a voluntary data submission process from a large number of EDs and has collected and reported on data through 2013.

The NHAMCS data survey measures the percent of patients who receive an imaging study, not taking into account how many imaging procedures are done on any single patient. The NHAMCS report found that 44 percent of patients received a simple X-ray in 1992. In 2011, that number was only 34 percent. The NHAMCS report indicates that 2 percent of patients had CT scanning performed in 1992. This increased to 14 percent in 2007 and peaked at 16 percent for 2010 and 2011.

The EDBA reports on ED utilization of diagnostic imaging as measured in the number of procedures performed per 100 patients seen. A patient having multiple imaging procedures performed (eg, a hip X-ray and a chest X-ray) would have two procedures in the EDBA reporting system but only be credited as one imaging patient in the NHAMCS data. The EDBA data survey for 2013 was developed from the performance measures reported by 1,151 EDs that saw 45 million patients in that calendar year.2 The data are reported in cohorts based on type and volume of patients seen in the ED (see Table 1).

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Computed TomographyDiagnosisEmergency DepartmentEmergency PhysicianImaging and UltrasoundLab TestOperationsPractice ManagementPractice TrendsProcedures and Skills

Related

  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Physicians of the Sandwich Generation Face Unique Challenges

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Texas Hospitals Now Must Ask About Immigration Status

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

About the Author

James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP

James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP, is national director of prehospital strategy for US Acute Care Solutions in Canton, Ohio; clinical professor of emergency medicine at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio; and vice president of the Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance.

View this author's posts »

2 Responses to “Diagnostic Testing Usage Data Can Help Emergency Physicians Manage Utilization”

  1. June 12, 2015

    henry richter Reply

    Drs. Augustine and Broida:
    REF: “The ED diagnostic Center”, ACEP NOW April 2015

    Your article brings up an interesting though subtle issue. Particularly focusing on soft tissues imaging ( US, CT, MRI), many of these tests are normal. The quick response is to bemoan the these normals as ” over-utilization”. However, the normals are of immense utility if used in the following manner.
    Please be aware I am not an academic and these observations are based on a 36 yr medical career, half spent in ED care, and half in primary care.
    Every normal test is predictive of remaining normal for a period of time. This infers that repeating the test will be de-facto over-utilization. The issue then is how long is this period of time? How much can this time interval be generalized to a population? How much of this time interval is specific to a single patient?
    Let me give examples. A normal biliary ultrasound will remain normal, in the sense of the diseases of ED interest, for years. Two years at least, approaching five years in a younger cohort. A normal CT pulmonary angiogram essentially rules out any consideration of PE close to forever. Any PE that occurs in the years after a normal test must then immediately provoke a search for an underlying cause. A normal CT abd/pelvis is good for at least a year.

    Of course clinical acumen is available, at any time, to over rule these generalizations. Cancer changes everything.

    The statistics in your article do not educate me any any useful way. So what is my basic thought. However, I am presenting you with an opportunity to delve into barren numbers and attempt to find a teachable moment for providers. Will you design a study to track the stability of patients given certain imaging results? As our profession moves into the era of ACOs, the issues increases in importance.
    Henry Richter MD

  2. July 20, 2015

    When the Hospital CEO Questions Test Utilization in the ED - THE FICKLE FINGER Reply

    […] has done a nice overview of the issue of the use of diagnostic testing utilization data in the ED, and this covers the issue in more […]

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603