Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The State of Emergency Medicine Quality Measures

By Dickson Cheung, M.D., Jennifer Wiler, M.D., Richard Newell, M.D., and Jay Brenner, M.D. | on November 1, 2011 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Another group of quality measures that may soon affect emergency medicine reimbursement involves the new Episode of Care (EOC) prototype. Recent passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) legislation in 2010 includes methods to develop and test novel models of health care delivery and payment reform. The goals are to reduce costs by eliminating waste and to improve patient health outcomes by aligning provider and hospital incentives. The proposed reforms are based on a “value-based purchasing” paradigm, rather than the current fee-for-service payment system, which reimburses providers and institutions based on the volume of services provided. The mandated development of global payment systems reimburses both hospitals and providers for the complete management of a patient over a defined period of time.

You Might Also Like
  • NEW RULES: the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)
  • Proposed Measures on CT Scans Cause Concern
  • Emergency Medicine Quality Measures
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 30 – No 11 – November 2011

NQF issued a call for candidate measures in July 2011 under the Endorsing Resource Use Standards project. The research and education foundation of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS-REF) and the Brookings Institution, working under a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, recently developed 22 separate measure specifications spanning 12 high-impact conditions. Eighteen of the 22 measures were submitted.

ACEP members contributed to this project known as the High Value Health Care Project: Characterizing Episodes and Costs of Care (C3). A controversial aspect of this project included attribution of the cost of care at the individual physician level. As of September 2011, these measures were withdrawn from NQF review until further field testing could be performed.

Two other organizations, Ingenix and NCQA, still have resource use measures under consideration.

Last, NQF is in the early stages of developing palliative care and regionalized emergency care measures. A group spearheaded by the University of North Carolina developed a white paper on regionalized emergency care for the NQF. Comments from ACEP were submitted in August 2011 during the solicitation period. A steering committee for palliative and end-of-life care gathered at the end of July 2011 to discuss a set of 12 new measures that may affect emergency medicine.

Conclusion

Quality measures continue to exert considerable influence on the practice and reimbursement of emergency care. While provider-based measures mainly focus on the clinical care of specific medical conditions, the overwhelming share of upcoming hospital-based measures address emergency department throughput, timeliness of care, and imaging utilization issues. The passage of Episodes of Care measures constructed on a value-based purchasing and bundled payment paradigm may be imminent.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansAntibioticCardiovascularClinical ExamDiagnosisEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianHealth InsuranceImaging and UltrasoundMedicaidMedicarePain and Palliative CareQuality

Related

  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • July 2025 News from the College

    July 2, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP Clinical Policy on Outpatient Mgmt. of Adults with Asymptomatic Elevated Blood Pressure

    June 25, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “The State of Emergency Medicine Quality Measures”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603