Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The State of Emergency Medicine Quality Measures

By Dickson Cheung, M.D., Jennifer Wiler, M.D., Richard Newell, M.D., and Jay Brenner, M.D. | on November 1, 2011 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

This article aims to provide background on quality measure reporting and reimbursement programs, as well as to update readers on the current, future, and disabled quality measures relevant to the practice of emergency medicine.

You Might Also Like
  • NEW RULES: the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)
  • Proposed Measures on CT Scans Cause Concern
  • Emergency Medicine Quality Measures
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 30 – No 11 – November 2011

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) remain the dominant player in the determination of how hospitals and providers are reimbursed with respect to quality.

The CMS directs its influence through three main programs: the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS), and the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS).

While hospitals are responsible for reporting the “core measures” (i.e., OPPS and IPPS programs), providers are responsible for reporting PQRS measures via claims through their billing companies. The OPPS and IPPS apply to all patients regardless of payer, with admitted patients reported via the IPPS and discharged/transferred patients via the OPPS. PQRS measures include admitted and discharged Medicare Part B patients only.

Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)

The 2006 Tax Relief and Health Care Act (TRHCA) required the establishment of a physician quality reporting system, including an incentive payment for eligible professionals who satisfactorily report data on quality measures for covered professional services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries beginning in the 2007 reporting period. This CMS program was formerly known as the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) or the Pay for Performance (P4P) program. In 2011, the name was changed to the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) to denote that it is no longer a pilot but rather an established program.

Provider-based measures largely originate from the AMA-PCPI (Physician Consortium on Performance Improvement, convened by the American Medical Association). This year, there are no additional measures that affect emergency medicine. Current PQRS measures are listed in Table 1; the new emergency department–relevant PQRS measures for 2011 are measures 91-93.

In addition, a number of proposed additional PQRS measures are now being considered for future implementation (see Table 2).

The schedule for additional financial incentives and penalties for satisfactorily reporting PQRS measures are outlined in Table 3.

Also, beginning in 2011, physicians will have the opportunity to earn an additional incentive of 0.5% by working with a Maintenance of Certification (MOC) entity and by 1) satisfactorily submitting data on quality measures under PQRS for a 12-month reporting period, either as an individual physician or as a member of a selected group practice; and by 2) participating in an MOC program and successfully completing a qualified MOC program practice assessment.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansAntibioticCardiovascularClinical ExamDiagnosisEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianHealth InsuranceImaging and UltrasoundMedicaidMedicarePain and Palliative CareQuality

Related

  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • July 2025 News from the College

    July 2, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP Clinical Policy on Outpatient Mgmt. of Adults with Asymptomatic Elevated Blood Pressure

    June 25, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “The State of Emergency Medicine Quality Measures”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603