Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Spotlight on Observation Care

By ACEP Now | on December 1, 2010 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“I am concerned that the benefits of ‘good’ observation services in dedicated units may be overlooked,” said Dr. Michael Ross, Medical Director of Observation Medicine at Emory University, Chair of the CMS APC Panel’s Observation Subcommittee, and author of several published studies on use of observation units. “I realize that one concern is the percentage of patients whose length of stay in observation is over 48 hours. However, the average length of stay in a dedicated observation unit is 15 hours, with less than 1% having a LOS over 48 hours.”

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Weighs In on Federal Regulatory Updates on Medicaid Managed Care, Medicare Outpatient Observation, and More
  • What Will the CMS Two-Midnight Rule Mean for Emergency Medicine?
  • New CMS Rules Introduce Bundled Payments for Observation Care
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 29 – No 12 – December 2010

Several well-done, randomized studies have shown that the length of stay in a dedicated unit is less than half that of care in a general inpatient bed. This more-efficient care addresses most of the issues currently raised. The 20% copay is much less when a decision is made in a timely manner (15 hours or less), and there is much less risk of using 3-day skilled nursing facility (SNF) qualifying time. Most of the observation failures reported in the news are for painful conditions in the elderly – a finding reported in Annals of Emergency Medicine 7 years ago. Elderly patients with painful conditions are more likely to fail observation and to return to the emergency department if discharged. Unfortunately, commercial admission criteria, such as those of Interqual, often are not based on strong evidence.

Well-performed observation services are good for the patients. Studies of observation protocols have shown improved patient satisfaction and quality of life relative to inpatient admission. Further, preventing avoidable admissions is very important for elderly patients, who are at a greater risk for decline in their functional status when they are hospitalized. Observation care has decreased diagnostic uncertainty. For example, chest pain observation protocols have been associated with a 90% reduction in the rate of missed heart attacks. Observation protocols have been shown to improve compliance with recommended diagnostic testing in conditions such as transient ischemic attack, syncope, or chest pain. Well-run dedicated observation units have been shown to decrease hospital admissions, ED crowding, ambulance diversion, and patients who leave the emergency department without being seen.

Finally, observation protocols have decreased unnecessary resource utilization and cost by 50%-70% of routine inpatient care costs.

The government should not focus on whether observation should occur, but on how and where it should occur and how to identify and encourage best practices for these patients. The overwhelming evidence from 2 decades of intense research in this area is that the setting should be in dedicated observation units. This is why ACEP’s 2008 policy on ED observation units considered this setting to be a “best practice” when done appropriately.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: BillingCardiovascularCMSCost of Health CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianLegalMedicareOut of the HospitalPainPain and Palliative CarePractice TrendsPulmonaryReimbursement and Coding

Related

  • Navigating the Health Care System in Vietnam with CKD/ESRD

    September 23, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • September 2025 News from the College

    August 29, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • The 2025 Emergency Physician Compensation Report

    August 29, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Spotlight on Observation Care”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603