Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Spotlight on Observation Care

By ACEP Now | on December 1, 2010 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Medicare claims for observation care rose from $828,000 in 2006 to more than $1.1 million in 2009. At the same time, claims for observation care lasting more than 48 hours tripled to $83,183. Arcane and confusing Medicare payment rules have left some beneficiaries on the hook for huge out-of-pocket payments for skilled nursing care they receive on release from the hospital, as well as copayments for “self-administered” drugs and other services.

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Weighs In on Federal Regulatory Updates on Medicaid Managed Care, Medicare Outpatient Observation, and More
  • What Will the CMS Two-Midnight Rule Mean for Emergency Medicine?
  • New CMS Rules Introduce Bundled Payments for Observation Care
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 29 – No 12 – December 2010

These policies have beneficiaries hopping mad, resulting in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) hosting a “listening session” in August in which they got an earful from beneficiaries and their advocates, physicians, and hospitals. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) put the issue on its September agenda, and Commissioners reacted strongly to the lack of logic in CMS policy.

A variety of factors created this unfortunate situation. First, the increase in observation volume has occurred for several reasons:

  • A steady shift from inpatient care to outpatient care has occurred over the past few decades – for example, as has been documented for chest pain.
  • Over the past decade, Medicare has changed its hospital payment policy from no separate payment for observation, to payment for only three approved conditions (chest pain, asthma, and congestive heart failure) with several clinical restrictions, then to lifting the clinical restrictions, and finally to paying a composite payment for all conditions starting in 2008. This is a change that ACEP strongly supported. This should have led to a doubling of volumes, but was associated with only about a 36% increase. However, this is still a substantial increase.
  • Medicare hired Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) to recoup money from hospitals for “overpayment” for health care services – such as an inpatient who should have been an observation patient. This scares hospitals and may be driving more observation utilization.
  • Elderly patients who are too sick to go home but not sick enough to be admitted – even after a prolonged period of observation. As hospitals become stricter regarding the use of criteria such as “Interqual” (to avoid RAC penalties) to decide who can be admitted as an inpatient, there are more and more “lost patients” in the system and many of them have a painful condition, such as back pain. These probably account for part of the growing percentage of Medicare patients whose length of stay is more than 48 hours (it is up to 7% nationally).

In its annual Report to Congress in March 2010, MedPAC representatives said the increase may be explained by hospitals’ heightened worries about more aggressive Medicare audits of admissions and Medicare’s decision in 2008 to expand criteria that allow patients to be placed in observation status. However, the number of people admitted to inpatient status remained stable, according to the report.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: BillingCardiovascularCMSCost of Health CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianLegalMedicareOut of the HospitalPainPain and Palliative CarePractice TrendsPulmonaryReimbursement and Coding

Related

  • ACEP Clinical Policy on Outpatient Mgmt. of Adults with Asymptomatic Elevated Blood Pressure

    June 25, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Rapid Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Dissection with POCUS

    June 11, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP 2025 Leadership & Advocacy Conference—Showing Up on Behalf of EM!

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Spotlight on Observation Care”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603