Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Some Fever-Free Newborns Evaluated for Serious Infection in the ED Can Be Discharged Early

By Megan Brooks (Reuters Health) | on July 29, 2019 | 0 Comment
Uncategorized
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Infants younger than four weeks old who have a history of fever but who remain fever-free during an observation period in the emergency department for serious bacterial infection (SBI) are good candidates for early discharge, new research suggests.

You Might Also Like
  • Prediction Rule Identifies Febrile Infants at Low Risk for Serious Bacterial Infection
  • Evaluating Fever in Well-Appearing Infants and Children
  • Early Fecal Transplant Improves Survival after Severe C. Diff Infection

About one-third of neonates who are evaluated in the ED for serious infection with reported fever are afebrile on initial presentation and these infants are thought to have the same risk of infections as those febrile at presentation, Dr. Sriram Ramgopal and colleagues from UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh point out in a paper online in Pediatrics.

But their retrospective chart review of infants evaluated for SBI at their center does not support this notion. Of 931 infants (mean age, 18 days; 54.5 percent boys), 60.2 percent had fever on presentation, 29.9 percent were afebrile with no subsequent fever, and 10.0 percent were afebrile at presentation but developed a fever during their hospital stay.

Infants with history of fever but afebrile on presentation and throughout their hospital stay had a significantly lower likelihood of SBI compared with those with a fever at presentation (odds ratio, 0.42; 95 percent confidence interval 0.23 to 0.79), although differences in invasive bacterial infection were not statistically significant.

In infants who were fever-free at first but developed a fever during their hospital stay, the median time to fever was 5.6 hours. This group had significantly higher odds of SBI (OR, 1.93, 95 percent CI 1.07 to 3.50) than did those with fever at presentation.

“Findings from this study suggest that a subset of initially afebrile infants tested for SBI who remain afebrile may be candidates for earlier discharge after a shorter observation period,” the researchers conclude in their article.

In email to Reuters Health, Dr. Ramgopal said, “There is already a body of expert opinion and evidence to suggest that it might be appropriate to discharge well appearing infants worked up for SBI after 24 hours. However, this is still not commonly practiced. This study might provide data to support the decision to discharge infants earlier in that particular population of infants who are only historically febrile and who remain afebrile after 20-24 hours of observation.”

However, the researchers emphasize that the decision to discharge after a period of observation must take into account multiple factors, including “the clinical appearance of the child, the total time the infant remained afebrile, any preliminary positive culture results, the provision of empirical antibiotics before discharge, and the ability of the treating physician to reach the caregiver in the event of a positive result.”

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: dischargeFeverinfectionPediatrics

Related

  • FACEPs in the Crowd: Dr. John Ludlow

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Nail Bed Injuries: What to Do—or Not to Do

    August 18, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Differential Diagnosis of an Infant with Easy Bleeding, Bruising

    August 14, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Some Fever-Free Newborns Evaluated for Serious Infection in the ED Can Be Discharged Early”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603