Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Opinion: Prehospital Naloxone Administration Is Safe

By Elizabeth A. Samuels, MD, MPH, Stephen Aks, DO, FACMT, FACEP, Edward Bernstein, MD, FACEP, Esther Choo, MD, MPH, Kristin Dwyer, MD, Traci Green, PhD, MSc, Jason B. Hack, MD, FACEP, David Juurlink, BPhm, MD, PhD, FRCPC, Michael J. Mello, MD, MPH, FACEP, Megan Ranney, MD, MPH, FACEP, Alexander Walley, MD, MSc, and Lauren Whiteside, MD, MS | on April 14, 2015 | 2 Comments
New Spin
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Opinion: Prehospital Naloxone Administration Is Safe

In the January 2015 ACEP Now article “True Cost of Stopping Overdoses,” Paul Kivela, MD, MBA, PhD, discussed several issues related to naloxone administration and sustainability of naloxone programs.1 Many of his concerns are the focus of existing and emerging policies and research. His piece highlighted how important it is for emergency physicians to be familiar with the literature and practice regarding prehospital naloxone use.

You Might Also Like
  • Naloxone Distribution to Patients in Emergency Department Raises Controversy
  • 5 Important Considerations for EMS Naloxone Administration
  • Overdose Antidote Naloxone Hydrochloride Available in California Pharmacies
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 34 – No 04 – April 2015

Naloxone has been used for more than 40 years and distributed through community-based programs since 1996. Many emergency physicians have worked with first responders to expand naloxone access. Recognizing the lifesaving potential of increased naloxone access, ACEP approved two related resolutions in 2014: to train and equip first responders with naloxone and to expand pharmacy-based naloxone provision and education. This year, ACEP will develop a clinical policy on emergency physicians’ prescribing naloxone.2 As we move forward in supporting expanded naloxone use, it is critically important for us to have a nuanced understanding of the existing literature.

Few Dangers With Prehospital Administration

Emergency medical services (EMS) providers are very experienced and familiar with naloxone administration and side effects. Research on EMS prehospital naloxone use has shown that serious complications, including violence and needle sticks, are rare.3 The most common side effect is precipitated opioid withdrawal, which is not life-threatening and is less likely with lower doses and intranasal administration.4,5

We agree with Dr. Kivela’s recommendation of needleless naloxone delivery and intranasal naloxone, which are already being used in many areas. Until intranasal atomizers and intramuscular auto-injectors become widely available and affordable, however, EMS and other first responders should feel safe (when using appropriate universal precautions) using intramuscular formulations.

Medication Stability

We appreciate Dr. Kivela’s point that, like many other pharmaceuticals, naloxone should be stored at room temperature and shielded from light until use. Studies have demonstrated naloxone’s stability. In one study, naloxone hydrochloride was cycled daily for 28 days through extreme temperatures (2°F–129°F). Samples retained 90 percent of their original concentration, a small degradation similar to that of nitroglycerin.6 Recommended storage is no different from other medications commonly used in the prehospital setting, such as the EpiPen, which has similar temperature and humidity recommendations.7,8 Quality-control checks of first responders’ equipment should include verifying expiration dates of naloxone, just as with any other transported medication.

Risks and Liabilities

After an overdose, most people are brought to the ED for evaluation and treatment. Refusal of treatment is a common concern faced by EMS providers and emergency physicians, and there is no clear consensus on how to manage these situations. The prehospital literature examining mortality among patients refusing transport after naloxone administration has shown no evidence of increased mortality and low incidence of ongoing respiratory depression.9–11 In these studies, patients who needed further monitoring were immediately identifiable. Patients with overdoses of multiple substances, or long-acting opioid formulations, will certainly need continued hospital monitoring. For now, patients who refuse transport or opt to leave the ED must do so against medical advice.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAddictionAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansCritical CareDrug OverdoseEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianNaloxoneOpiatePublic Health

Related

  • Opinion: Physicians Must Reduce Plastic Waste

    December 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

2 Responses to “Opinion: Prehospital Naloxone Administration Is Safe”

  1. April 22, 2015

    Kerry Broderick Reply

    This is a wonderful piece. Full of helpful references for us ‘Naloxone Nerds’.

    We have a ‘Naloxone for Life’ program at Denver Health and it is an integrated program and includes; internal medicine, pharmacy, emergency medicine and behavioral health.

    Thanks for your information and encouragement
    Kerryann Broderick, BSN, MD

  2. May 12, 2015

    E. J. Read, Jr., MD, FACEP Reply

    According to the Package Insert, the naloxone contained in EVZIO was specifically developed for community environments (that have greater variation in temperatures) to sustain bioavailability.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603