Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Noninvasive Management of Sepsis

By ACEP Now | on April 1, 2012 | 0 Comment
CME CME Now
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Comparing response to therapy with lactate levels versus mixed-venous oxygen levels showed a statistically significant difference in mortality between groups.25 Further, lactate may be a superior marker for physicians to follow versus mixed-venous oxygenation. Response to therapy in patients undergoing EGDT showed that normalized mixed-venous oxygen saturation did not always predict an improvement in lactate or mortality.24 Trending lactate as a peripheral marker of sepsis is a valuable and valid tool in identifying and treating this disease process.

You Might Also Like
  • Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasound
  • Sepsis in Pregnancy
  • Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation In the Emergency Department
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 31 – No 04 – April 2012

Initiating Noninvasive Management

Multiple protocols have adapted Dr. Rivers’ EGDT protocol to a noninvasive approach. The below protocol is adapted from the STOP Sepsis Collaborative (http://emcrit.org/wp-content/uploads/non-invasive.pdf).

For initial resuscitation, all patients should have reliable 18-g IV access at multiple sites, be placed on supplemental O2, and have blood drawn and sent for basic labs, ABG/VBG, and lactate levels in addition to blood cultures. Draw cultures from all indwelling vascular access devices. This resuscitation should not be performed with a single IV or one that is positional. The following also apply:

  • Antibiotics should be given as soon as possible. Giving broad-spectrum antibiotics within the first hour carries a clear mortality benefit.25,26,28
  • Source control is paramount.29 Note if the patient has a tense belly, necrotic tissue, decubitus ulcers, signs of CNS infection, indwelling devices, or rales or other pulmonary infectious symptoms.27
  • Assess volume status using IVC ultrasound to estimate CVP/RA pressure. If greater than 50% collapse, large-volume resuscitation is needed.
  • Administer 20-30 mL/kg crystalloid fluid bolus. Large volumes (over 6 L) of normal saline resuscitation will cause hyperchloremia and a resultant nongap acidosis. Consider lactated ringer’s for subsequent boluses if easily available.
  • Be aware of laboratory values for evidence of severe sepsis (Table 2). Consider switching these patients to invasive management if they fail to improve their lactate by 10% in the first 2 hours.24

For management of noninvasive resuscitation, the following apply:

  • Perform serial ultrasound assessments of the IVC after each bolus of crystalloid.
  • Continue giving 500-mL to 1,000-mL boluses of crystaloid every 20 minutes until the IVC no longer shows significant collapse on ultrasound. There still should be respiratory variation of about 30% collapse (Table 3).
  • Recheck MAP: If the patient remains hypotensive (MAP under 65 mm Hg) after adequate fluid loading, switch to invasive strategy in order to begin vasopressor therapy.
  • Evaluate response to therapy with lactate levels every 2 hours. Assess mental status and urine output.
  • If the lactate has decreased by 10%, continue resuscitation and admit to a non-ICU monitored bed.
  • If lactate is rising or has decreased to less than 10% and hemoglobin is less than 7 g/dL, transfuse 1 U of PRBC.
  • Transfusion may be considered in patients with hemoglobin of 7-10 g/dL. Also, continue additional 1,000-mL crystalloid volume resuscitation or start peripheral dobutamine to improve cardiac output.
  • If the above therapies fail to reduce lactate by the second lactate level measured 4 hours into resuscitation, switch to invasive sepsis management.

Nonresponse to Management

For patients refractory to noninvasive sepsis therapy, place a central line and admit to the ICU.

Summary

Noninvasive management of sepsis is a compelling therapy from a number of perspectives: 1) prevention of central line placement, 2) broad applicability to centers with limited resource to follow central venous monitoring, 3) quicker and individualized approach to resuscitation. Time and well-conducted prospective trials will tell the difference between the invasive and noninvasive approaches. Currently, the data suggest that noninvasive sepsis management is safe and effective in appropriate patient populations.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Topics: AntibioticCMEDiagnosisEducationEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianInfectious DiseaseProcedures and SkillsResearchUltrasound

Related

  • FACEPs in the Crowd: Dr. John Ludlow

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP4U: the ACEP/CORD Teaching Fellowship

    November 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Rare Pulmonary Embolism After Routine PIVC Insertion

    September 22, 2025 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Noninvasive Management of Sepsis”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603