Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Medical Claim Reimbursement Upheld for Auto-Related EMS Response, Trauma Care in Minnesota

By Shari Augustin | on August 14, 2014 | 0 Comment
Hot off the Presses
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP, National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians Celebrate EMS Week May 17–23
  • ACEP Poll Shows High Out-of-Pocket Costs Deter Patients from Seeking Emergency Health Care
  • ACEP Says FAIR Health Database Is Fair
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 08 – August 2014

Minnesota is a “no-fault” auto insurance state, providing that auto insurance policies include first-dollar medical coverage, up to $20,000, for an individual injured in a motor vehicle accident. No-fault auto coverage serves as critical reimbursement for auto-related EMS response and trauma care services. Alerted by billers of a new trend in which law firms were interfering in the reimbursement of medical claims, Minnesota Chapter ACEP (MNACEP) worked to pass an amendment in the final hours of the legislative session to fix the emerging issue. A growing number of law firms, encouraged by seminars advising on the practice, had begun to issue liens and notices of representation to auto insurance carriers in order to intercept the medical claim reimbursement to the provider for treatment provided to an accident victim. This was done prior to any legitimate arbitration decision or denial.

Most often, EMS and trauma providers would learn of the interception of the payment upon receipt of an explanation of benefits (EOB) from the insurance company showing the claim as paid. However, rather than reimburse the provider for services rendered, the insurer redirected payment to the lawyer due to a notice to the insurer of a lien or certificate of representation. The law firm might make reduced payments to providers out of the $20,000 benefit or, in some cases, suggest providers treat the bill as charity care or bill the claim to the injured patient’s health insurance, despite an EOB clearly showing payment of the medical claim.

Approached about the issue, the trial attorneys’ association, Minnesota Association for Justice, and insurance industry representatives denounced the practice and joined MNACEP in the pursuit of a legislative solution. The bill, signed by Governor Dayton on May 21, 2014, clearly states that firms are prohibited from placing liens on no-fault awards to providers if an insurer had not denied the no fault claim. This represents preserving millions of dollars in first-dollar coverage for the health care provider and EMS community.


Ms. Augustin is the Minnesota ACEP executive director.

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansCost of Health CareEmergency DepartmentEmergency Medical ServicesHealth PolicyLegalPainPatient CareTrauma and Injury

Related

  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Let Core Values Help Guide Patient Care

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Navigating the Health Care System in Vietnam with CKD/ESRD

    September 23, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Medical Claim Reimbursement Upheld for Auto-Related EMS Response, Trauma Care in Minnesota”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603