Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Mayor Bloomberg and narcotics

By Liam Yore, M.D. | on March 1, 2013 | 0 Comment
Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

There was a bit of hue and cry earlier regarding Mayor Bloomberg’s report on the matter of prescription drug abuse and restrictions on new prescriptions for painkillers through the emergency department.

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Adopts Opioid Clinical Policy Recommendation addresses critical issues in the prescribing of opioids for adult patients
  • Is “Severe Pain” considered an emergency medical condition under EMTALA?
  • ED Opioid Guidelines Tied to Fewer Prescriptions in Ohio
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 32 – No 03 – March 2013

Initially, I was concerned. I completely agree with this comment: “Here is my problem with legislative medicine,” said Dr. Alex Rosenau, president-elect of the American College of Emergency Physicians. … “It prevents me from being a professional and using my judgment.”

The verbiage used regarding the new rules was worrisome: restricted sharply … city policy … will not be dispensed … regulatory authority to impose, and the like.

I’m like most doctors in that even when I agree with the purpose of proposed rules, I quite object to interference in how I practice, to “the government coming between you and your doctor.” as it was so memorably put in the past.

And given that Bloomberg is getting something of a reputation for being a little dictator I was all ready to get my pitchfork and torches and head down to join the mob.

While I was getting my outrage machine up to operating temperature, I took a moment to read the official press release and the actual source document (PDF), though, and one word in the very first paragraph, notably absent from the press coverage of the proposal, jumped out at me:

Voluntary: Well, that’s a horse of a different color, isn’t it? Doctors and hospitals are encouraged but not obligated to follow the new guidelines. I’m good with that. So what about the meat of the policy?

Key points jumped out at me:

  • A new/improved database for tracking narcotic prescriptions and making it available to prescribing doctors.
  • Not prescribing more than a 3-day supply of most narcotics, and not at all prescribing oxycontin, fentanyl, or methadone through the ER, and not refilling these meds.
  • All narcotics to be electronically prescribed (to limit forged prescriptions).
  • Changing the defaults on EMRs to have lower amounts of tablets dispensed.

Frankly, these all seem reasonable, as long as physician discretion is preserved. If someone has a long-bone fracture and won’t be into see ortho for a week, well then a week’s worth of pain meds is reasonable, for example.

In our state, we put forth some very similar guidelines in our “Seven best Practices” for reducing ER overuse and abuse.

The “guidelines” are particularly useful for a practicing doc in that it gives you permission to say “no.” Currently, if I see a patient I suspect is “working me” for narcotics, but don’t have clear evidence to support that suspicion, I am in a bind.

In such cases, there’s no objective evidence of disease – back pain, neuropathy, etc – but that doesn’t mean there isn’t real pain.

If I say no, I run the risk of patient complaints and a letter from the CEO. If I say yes, I then get bogged down in negotiations over how much and what drug. The guidelines offer a compromise: a limited supply of less potent meds. If the patient ups the ante or tries to demand more, I can point to the guidelines and explain that we have a policy.

Even better there are clear guidelines against refills and treating of chronic non-cancer pain in the ED. All this gives doctors the institutional backing to say no, and tacitly recognizes that doctors have been complicit in creating the problem through excessive opiate use.

I note that endorsing the proposal in NYC was the New York chapter of ACEP, which is also heartening. The problem of ER abuse and prescription narcotic addiction/diversion is a real issue, and it is growing.

We, as ER physicians, need to take ownership of the problem, as much as we can, and take leadership in developing measures to mitigate the problem. If we don’t, then it is predictable that someone else, likely state governments, will come in and impose their solutions on us – and those “solutions” are likely to be heavy-handed, draconian, and probably ineffective.

From what I can tell, New York’s approach seems well reasoned and hopefully effective. I am encouraged by an addendum that several private hospitals in the NYC area have announced they are also going to follow these guidelines (which properly only apply to city-owned hospitals). I’m also pleased that the process we went through in our state has begun to be used as a model for other states to follow!


Dr. Yore is an emergency physician and administrator living in the Pacific Northwest. This is an abridged version of the orignal blog, which appeared at the blog site allbleedingstops.blogspot.com. Dr. Yore routinely blogs under the name of Shadowfax.

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Topics: ACEPBloggEDClinical GuidelineCommentaryEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianPatient SafetyPharmaceuticalsPoliticsPublic Policy

Related

  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Overcoming Language Barriers in the Emergency Department

    October 21, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Event Medicine: Where Fun and Safety Sing in Perfect Harmony

    October 9, 2025 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Mayor Bloomberg and narcotics”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603