Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Legal Wrangling, Political Debate Continue as Affordable Care Act Takes Hold

By Bryn Nelson | on March 6, 2014 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Legal Wrangling, Political Debate Continue as Affordable Care Act Takes Hold

Republicans have adapted, too. In January, three Republican senators unveiled a “repeal and replace” alternative called the Patient Choice, Affordability, Responsibility and Empowerment (CARE) Act. The overhaul eliminates or reduces most government mandates while offering tax credits to help lower-income people buy insurance. The proposal limits the tax exclusion for insurance offered by employers and permits insurers to charge more for preexisting conditions if beneficiaries do not maintain continuous coverage.

You Might Also Like
  • Opinion: Dispelling Myths, Reiterating Facts About the Affordable Care Act
  • Pennsylvania Governor Acts to Ensure Federal Health Care Subsidies
  • Emergency Medicine and the Affordable Care Act
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 03 – March 2014

In February, the Obama administration responded to sustained pressure from the business community by delaying the ACA’s insurance mandate for employers with 50 to 99 workers until 2016. The news revived a Republican talking point that the law unfairly postpones rules for businesses but not individuals.

Push to Curb ED Visits by New Medicaid Beneficiaries

Backers of the ACA have argued that improved access to health care might decrease emergency department visits by new Medicaid beneficiaries. Experts, however, have warned of an increase in ED visits—at least initially—and the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services recently released guidelines designed to mitigate any uptick in unnecessary visits.

Among the agency’s three main strategies: focusing on “super-utilizers” through services like health homes and on-site ambulatory clinics, increasing access to primary care, and using more targeted interventions for patients with behavioral health issues.

Several experts told Modern Healthcare they were unimpressed with the guidelines, citing a lack of new ideas and insufficient attention to mental health. Meanwhile, a study in the journal Science added fuel to the fire by finding that new Medicaid beneficiaries in Oregon significantly increased their visits to the ED and to other care providers during their first 18 months of coverage.

Why? Economists told The New York Times that patients may be accessing ED services more often as Medicaid reduces their upfront costs. Experts have hotly debated whether this higher usage will persist and whether it also reflects a lack of primary care access. The heightened demand could put more strain on the nation’s emergency physicians, though the overall financial impact may be more limited. In 2010, a government report found, total ED visits represented only 4 percent of total U.S. health care spending.


Bryn Nelson is a freelance medical journalist based in Seattle.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Affordable Care ActCost of Health CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianHealth InsuranceLegalMedicaidMedicarePatient CarePublic Policy

Related

  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Let Core Values Help Guide Patient Care

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Navigating the Health Care System in Vietnam with CKD/ESRD

    September 23, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Legal Wrangling, Political Debate Continue as Affordable Care Act Takes Hold”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603