Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

How to Manage Suspected Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

By Christian Tomaszewski, MD, MS, MBA, FACEP | on November 16, 2018 | 1 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Tomaszewski is professor of clinical emergency medicine at the University of California San Diego Health and chief medical officer of El Centro Regional Medical Center.

You Might Also Like
  • Is That Chest Pain Unstable Angina or Acute Coronary Syndrome?
  • Studies Bolster Statin Use for Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Less-Aggressive Approach to Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Advised
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 37 – No 11 – November 2018

Reference

  1. Tomaszewski CA, Nestler D, Shah KH, et al. American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72(5):e65-e106.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ACSAcute Coronary SyndromeCardiacnon–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome

Related

  • Annals ECG of the Month: Acute Coronary Occlusion

    August 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Pancreatitis Mimics STEMI

    December 11, 2023 - 1 Comment
  • Chest-Pain Case Reminds Us of the Importance of Clinical Decision Tools

    January 11, 2022 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

One Response to “How to Manage Suspected Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome”

  1. December 2, 2018

    Jerry W. Jones, MD FACEP FAAEM Reply

    Overall, a good presentation and I do agree with many of your views though there are a few statements that give me pause.

    “Most emergency physicians strive to attain a miss rate of less than 1 percent. However, it is questionable if the benefits of further testing outweigh the risks of harm of untreated disease once that threshold reaches 2 percent, which the committee felt was a more realistic expectation. With shared decision making, patients may be willing to accept rates higher than those to which physicians hold themselves accountable.”

    0% rate of MACE remains the holy grail of all physicians treating patients with chest pain and especially emergency physicians. I think every ER physician should strive for 0% MACE, no matter HOW unattainable that figure may realistically be. Aiming for 2% will only result in figures higher than 2%. And I can’t imagine trying to talk a patient into leaving the ER with a potential for MACE greater than that with which I myself would feel comfortable. That just seems hypocritical and unethical to me. At some point we must ask ourselves, “Are we working for the patient or for an insurance company?” In the quote above, you essentially ask if it is worth trying to reduce incidents of MACE from 2% to less than 1%. Worth to whom – the patient or the insurance companies? These percentages are not spanning a career in EM – many of us will reach those percentages every few months.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603