Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Chest-Pain Case Reminds Us of the Importance of Clinical Decision Tools

By Eric Funk, MD | on January 11, 2022 | 0 Comment
ED Critical Care Medicolegal Mind
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In this month’s case, we cover a classic high-risk medicolegal topic: chest pain. There has been extensive research on this topic in pursuit of identifying low-risk patients who can be discharged safely. This case occurred in 2011, so bear in mind that we have made significant strides over the past 10 years.

You Might Also Like
  • HEART Score Safe for ED Evaluation of Chest Pain
  • 20 Years in the Evolution of ED Care of Chest Pain
  • New Guidelines Aim to Help the Evaluation of Chest Pain
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 41 – No 01 – January 2022

The Case

A 58-year-old woman presented to a small emergency department with chest pain. The patient and her husband lived in a different state and were visiting his parents. They were helping with some tasks around their house; she had been outside washing a Jeep. She had developed a slight sunburn on her back prior to noticing chest pain.

When she presented to the emergency department, the chest pain had been present for two to three hours. She described it at one point as a burning pain and at another point as a “raw” sensation. She had taken a Lortab with no improvement and also had vomited once.

In the emergency department, her vitals showed a blood pressure of 116/57, pulse of 94 bpm, respiratory rate of 24 per minute, temperature of 97.0 ºF, and an oxygen saturation of 90 percent on room air.

The physician did not have access to any previous medical records as this was her first time visiting this health system. However, he did note that she smoked a pack of cigarettes each day and had hypercholesterolemia, Crohn’s disease, hypothyroidism, and anxiety. The physical exam did not reveal any abnormalities.

The physician ordered an ECG, complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, magnesium test, creatine kinase-MB, and troponin.

The patient was given nitroglycerin 0.4 mg sublingual, with no change in her pain. A 500-mL bolus of normal saline was given. After 30 mg of Toradol IV, she stated she felt “maybe a little better.”

The results of her tests showed a mild leukocytosis (14.4), slight hyperglycemia (118), and slight hypokalemia (3.3). The troponin was 0.06, within the normal limits of 0.0–0.10. The creatine kinase-MB was also normal. Her ECG was read as “normal sinus rhythm” by the physician.

The court documents had a poor copy of the ECG that would not appear well in print but is available for review at www.medmalreviewer.com/ekg.

The physician reasoned that the patient had a negative troponin, no ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on ECG, and no relief of pain with nitroglycerin. The patient was discharged home.

The following morning, the patient was in the kitchen with her in-laws, making coffee. She suddenly collapsed and became unresponsive. They called 911. When EMS arrived, she was in ventricular fibrillation. She was defibrillated six times and finally had return of spontaneous circulation.

She was taken back to the same emergency department, arriving at 7:08 a.m. During the next 50 minutes, she lost pulses several times, and the physician caring for her placed her on a dopamine drip.

The process to transfer her to another facility started around 7:49 a.m. An EMS helicopter landed at 8:29 a.m. to whisk her to the receiving facility. During the flight, she briefly lost pulses, but return of spontaneous circulation was achieved again. By 9:04 a.m., she was in the catheterization lab at a university medical center. She was found to have a 100 percent occlusion of her right coronary artery, and a stent was placed (see Figure 1).

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Acute Coronary SyndromeChest PainMalpracticeRisk

Related

  • Annals ECG of the Month: Retrosternal, Pressure-Like Chest Pain

    July 2, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Rapid Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Dissection with POCUS

    June 11, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • May 2025 News from the College

    May 6, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: July 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Chest-Pain Case Reminds Us of the Importance of Clinical Decision Tools”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603