Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Grant Program Funds Venous Thromboembolism Management Projects

By Megan Sambell and Darrin Scheid, CAE | on March 9, 2025 | 1 Comment
ACEP4U
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dozens of submissions to win grant funding to combat these challenges came from across the country. Three stood out, and here are the core components of their submissions:

You Might Also Like
  • Should You Use Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Cancer-Associated VTE?
  • ACEP Clinical Policy Review: Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
  • Lack of Data for Evaluating Venothromboembolic Disease In Pregnant Patients Leaves Physicians Looking for Best Approach
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: March 02

Corewell Health

  • Tailor and implement an evidence-based PE clinical pathway that provides rural ED clinicians with clear criteria for screening PE patients for outpatient management, readily available clinical decision support tools, and a mechanism to ensure reliable expedited follow-up.
  • Increase utilization of validated severity assessment tools among stable rural PE patients.
  • Establish a virtual PE follow-up clinic using existing telehealth infrastructure to guarantee availability of follow-up for rural ED patients discharged with low-risk PE, proactively identify and address barriers to medication compliance, and bridge the transition back to a PCP.
  • Utilize a recently established VACC to introduce a protocol-driven virtual follow up visit for PE patients within 72 hours of ED discharge to assess clinical stability, facilitate diagnostic testing, address barriers to medication compliance, and ensure subsequent PCP follow-up.
  • Ensure rapid, consistent, follow-up care to PE patients discharged from rural EDs, reduce unnecessary return ED visits, eliminate interruptions in anticoagulation.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

  • Develop and implement an interdisciplinary clinical pathway that includes an electronic medical record (EMR) order set and a discharge smart set to guide the management of low-risk VTE patients in the ED.
  • Evaluate the impact of the pathway on key outcome measures, including: the reduction in admission rates for low-risk VTE patients, a decrease in ED return visit rates within 72 hours and 30 days, and an increase in the rate of initiation outpatient treatment and follow-up care, particularly for uninsured or underinsured patients.
  • Enhance provider knowledge and adherence to evidence-based guidelines for the outpatient management of low-risk VTE through targeted education and clinical decision-support tools embedded within the EMR.
  • Improve patient education and empowerment by developing and disseminating patient-centered educational materials that promote treatment adherence, self-management, and understanding of VTE.
  • Foster collaboration and communication among interdisciplinary team members involved in the care of low-risk VTE patients, including emergency physicians, pharmacists, social workers, and case managers.

Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences

  • Develop and implement a comprehensive training program for interdisciplinary health care workers in rural EDs to enhance their ability to manage low-risk VTE patients safely on an outpatient basis.
  • Increase the knowledge and application of evidence-based VTE management guidelines among health care professionals in targeted communities.
  • Identify and evaluate barriers to safe, effective outpatient VTE care for low-risk patients in rural emergency medicine, focusing on health equity.
  • Establish and implement system-based changes and procedures, guided by an interdisciplinary team, for identifying and treating low-risk VTE patients eligible for outpatient care across participating rural hospital EDs.
  • Integrate virtual health through telehealth into outpatient care for low-risk VTE patients to enhance post-ED care access and improve adherence to provider recommendations.

Corewell, Mount Sinai, and Oklahoma State were notified of their grant funding in October. Each proposal included a timeline for completion.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ClinicalGrantsPractice ManagmentVenous Thromboembolism

Related

  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Department Management of Prehospital Tourniquets

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP’s October 2025 Poll: How Often Do You Read Your Own X-Rays?

    September 30, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

One Response to “Grant Program Funds Venous Thromboembolism Management Projects”

  1. March 23, 2025

    David McClellan Reply

    I can’t believe they actually did funding for this. This scientific information is already well established in numerous programs have been done with it. This is something, treating outpatient, Venus involved disease, that we’ve been doing for decades, and for pulmonary embolism for nearly a decade very redundant research.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603