Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Endovascular Therapy With or Without tPA—What Do the Studies Say?

By Ken Milne, MD | on July 15, 2020 | 0 Comment
Skeptics' Guide to EM
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Bottom Line

If EVT is readily available and the patient is a candidate for this treatment modality, there does not appear to be a role for systemic thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

You Might Also Like
  • Endovascular Therapy May be Effective for Strokes from More Distal Occlusions
  • Endovascular Intervention for Stroke May Become Alternative to tPA
  • When Every Second Counts, Know When to Use tPA
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 39 – No 07 – July 2020

Case Resolution

You engage in shared decision making with the patient and her spouse. The decision is to hold off on administration of systemic thrombolytics and await the neurointerventional team. They arrive and take the patient for EVT, and she has a successful outcome.

Thank you to Dr. Anand Swaminathan, an assistant professor of emergency medicine at St. Joseph’s Regional Medical Center in Paterson, New Jersey, for his help with this review.

Remember to be skeptical of anything you learn, even if you heard it on the Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine. 

References

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581-1587.
  2. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317-1329.
  3. American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Subcommittee (Writing Committee) on Use of Intravenous tPA for Ischemic Stroke: Brown MD, Burton JH, Nazarian DJ, et al. Clinical policy: use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for the management of acute ischemic stroke in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;66(3):322-333.e31.
  4. Milne WK, Lang E, Ting DK, et al. CJEM debate series: #TPA should be the initial treatment in eligible patients presenting with an acute ischemic stroke. CJEM. 2020;22(2):142-148.
  5. Alper BS, Foster G, Thabane L, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3-4.5 hours after acute ischaemic stroke: trial reanalysis adjusted for baseline imbalances. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020;bmjebm-2020-111386.
  6. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PSS, Beumer D, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11-20.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Acute Ischemic StrokeEndovascular TherapyStrokeThrombolysistPA

Related

  • ACEP Clinical Policy on Thrombolytics for Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke

    July 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Thrombolytics in Stroke: Moving Beyond Controversy to Comprehensive Care

    December 7, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • The Latest Research in Neurologic Emergencies

    September 6, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

Ken Milne, MD

Ken Milne, MD, is chief of emergency medicine and chief of staff at South Huron Hospital, Ontario, Canada. He is on the Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine faculty and is creator of the knowledge translation project the Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine.

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Endovascular Therapy With or Without tPA—What Do the Studies Say?”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603