Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Should Emergency Physicians Abandon Face-Mask Ventilation?

By Richard M. Levitan, MD, FACEP | on January 11, 2017 | 3 Comments
Airway
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In addition to the ergonomic difficulties of face-mask ventilation, problems creating an effective seal, and issues delivering oxygen into the lungs at low pressure, mask ventilation in a supine position has many disadvantages in terms of oxygenation.

You Might Also Like
  • How to Manage Fluids in Emergency Airway Procedures
  • Avoid Airway Catastrophes on the Extremes of Minute Ventilation
  • 10 Tips for Safety in Airway Management
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 36 – No 01 – January 2017

In a flat position, the abdominal contents push the diaphragm upward, reducing the functional residual capacity of the lungs. Additionally, the posterior lung segments collapse.

Unlike pressurization of the oropharynx, pressurization of the nasopharynx causes passive opening of the airway as the soft palate is pushed away from the posterior pharynx (see Figure 1). Combining nasal oxygen with pulling on the mandible is an incredibly easy and fast way to open the upper airway. Oxygen shoots from the nasopharynx, down into the upper airway, and into the trachea. In the patient who is upright, the diaphragm drops and the lungs expand. Through the miracle of hemoglobin, oxygen is drawn down the trachea as it gets absorbed across the alveolar capillary membrane even without positive pressure ventilation (apneic oxygenation).

I used to bag patients as my initial response to hypoxemia in the emergency setting. Now, I put Oxygen On, Pull on the mandible, and Sit the patient up (OOPS). I have done this in the setting of oversedation and narcotic overdose, which resulted in complete apnea, and oxygenation improves quickly. I sometimes augment nasal oxygen at the top of the flow meter 15+ liters with a non-rebreather to boost oxygen flow >30 lpm.

In cardiac arrest, I used to bag patients while preparing to intubate. Now, I use passive apneic oxygenation and, if necessary, place an LMA-type device to run the initial portion of the code.

My current use of mask ventilation is only when I want to deliver some positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; PEEP valves should be on every BVM). This is generally only used when inducing patients for intubation. I gently ventilate for a couple of breaths when I use muscle relaxants to confirm that I can bag the patient and to expand the alveoli during the onset phase of muscle relaxants. I always do so in a head-elevated position (at least ear-to-sternal notch). I am careful to use low pressure, low volumes, and low rates, except in situations of compensatory respiratory alkalosis. My use of face-mask ventilation in these settings is generally with a nasal cannula, which helps stent the airway open and augment flow. I choose to perform face-mask ventilation in this situation, as opposed to an LMA, because I am worried about the LMA device being inserted too early, which could trigger active vomiting before rapid-sequence intubation medications kick in.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: AirwayED Critical CareEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianFace MaskIntubationLaryngeal MaskPatient CarePatient FlowQuality & SafetyRespiratoryVentilation

Related

  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Let Core Values Help Guide Patient Care

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

Richard M. Levitan, MD, FACEP

Richard M. Levitan, MD, FACEP, is an adjunct professor of emergency medicine at Dartmouth’s Geisel School of Medicine in Hanover, N.H., and a visiting professor of emergency medicine at the University of Maryland in Baltimore. He works clinically at a critical care access hospital in rural New Hampshire and teaches cadaveric and fiber-optic airway courses.

View this author's posts »

3 Responses to “Should Emergency Physicians Abandon Face-Mask Ventilation?”

  1. January 30, 2017

    Jose Dionisio Torres, Jr., MD Reply

    What do we have is cost and demand? And the illusion of patient safety.
    The public doesn’t know the difference from a bvm..and and lma/or king lt.
    These devices are better in ventilation than bvm. But need the bvm if there is a contraindication.
    Facemask cheaper but ensures air will go into the stomach ensuring higher risk of aspiration. But don’t use in Coffin position described by you Dr. Levitan. Ramp them up as high as possible if bvm is to be used.
    Thank you for the Post Dr. Levitan.
    Thank you Mr. Robert Ackerman on sharing this post with me.

  2. March 5, 2017

    Craig Navarijo Reply

    I believe the bvm can be made much more safely than it is today…

    in fact, I have working protoypes of a bvm that an individual can selectivley limit volume delivery with.

    and that makes maintaining a seal extremely easy ….

  3. March 6, 2017

    Steve LeCroy Reply

    Dr. Levitan,

    Would you consider using one or two NPA’s like naso-flo that can provide supplemental oxygen along with CPAP instead of a cannula and non-rebreather mask?

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603