Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Should Emergency Physicians Abandon Face-Mask Ventilation?

By Richard M. Levitan, MD, FACEP | on January 11, 2017 | 3 Comments
Airway
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Face-mask ventilation is considered a fundamental procedural skill in emergency medicine. We have historically deployed it when patients are apneic, are hypoventilating, or need assistance with oxygenation. We keep bag-mask units at the head of every bed in the emergency department.

You Might Also Like
  • How to Manage Fluids in Emergency Airway Procedures
  • Avoid Airway Catastrophes on the Extremes of Minute Ventilation
  • 10 Tips for Safety in Airway Management
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 36 – No 01 – January 2017

The world of airway management has evolved since the self-inflating bag-valve mask (BVM) was first created more than 50 years ago. In elective anesthesia, the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has entirely replaced face-mask ventilation as a strategy for airway and anesthetic management in cases with a low risk of aspiration. In fact, the laryngeal mask is now used in the majority of elective anesthesia cases worldwide. It also has a rapidly growing presence in the world of prehospital care, especially in the United Kingdom and Europe.

The tip of the laryngeal mask wedges into the upper esophagus, behind the cricoid cartilage. It provides a wedge-shaped “stopper” to the upper esophagus; it’s not quite as effective as a tracheal tube in isolating the trachea from the esophagus but is far better than pushing gas by face mask into the shared upper aero-digestive tract of the pharynx.

LMA-type devices have replaced intubation and mask ventilation in elective anesthesia because they are better for both patients and operators. The laryngeal mask “sits” itself around the curve of the tongue and stays in position. The face mask requires continued downward pressure on the mask to maintain a seal. It can also be augmented by compressive head straps. The laryngeal mask can be easily used to bag a patient with one hand stabilizing the top of the device and the other squeezing the bag. This is not the case with a face mask. Holding the mask against the face works poorly, even with an “E-C grip” (using first and seconds digits [“C”] to hold the nasal bridge of the mask and the third, fourth, and fifth digits [“E”] to hold the lower mask).

Face-mask ventilation is as ergonomically smooth as walking in ski boots. The mask seals by being pushed onto the face, but this motion also pushes the mandible, base of the tongue, and epiglottis downward. And particularly in supine patients with no muscular tone, the base of the tongue, epiglottis, and mandible fall backward, causing “collapse” of the airway. Without continuous active lifting of the angle of the mandible, the airway obstructs. Conversely, the laryngeal mask seal is achieved by the same soft tissues falling backward onto the bowl of the device. It is not the inflation of a cuff that creates a mucosal seal; the newest and best laryngeal masks have, in fact, no cuffs at all. They mirror the laryngeal anatomy.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: AirwayED Critical CareEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianFace MaskIntubationLaryngeal MaskPatient CarePatient FlowQuality & SafetyRespiratoryVentilation

Related

  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Let Core Values Help Guide Patient Care

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

Richard M. Levitan, MD, FACEP

Richard M. Levitan, MD, FACEP, is an adjunct professor of emergency medicine at Dartmouth’s Geisel School of Medicine in Hanover, N.H., and a visiting professor of emergency medicine at the University of Maryland in Baltimore. He works clinically at a critical care access hospital in rural New Hampshire and teaches cadaveric and fiber-optic airway courses.

View this author's posts »

3 Responses to “Should Emergency Physicians Abandon Face-Mask Ventilation?”

  1. January 30, 2017

    Jose Dionisio Torres, Jr., MD Reply

    What do we have is cost and demand? And the illusion of patient safety.
    The public doesn’t know the difference from a bvm..and and lma/or king lt.
    These devices are better in ventilation than bvm. But need the bvm if there is a contraindication.
    Facemask cheaper but ensures air will go into the stomach ensuring higher risk of aspiration. But don’t use in Coffin position described by you Dr. Levitan. Ramp them up as high as possible if bvm is to be used.
    Thank you for the Post Dr. Levitan.
    Thank you Mr. Robert Ackerman on sharing this post with me.

  2. March 5, 2017

    Craig Navarijo Reply

    I believe the bvm can be made much more safely than it is today…

    in fact, I have working protoypes of a bvm that an individual can selectivley limit volume delivery with.

    and that makes maintaining a seal extremely easy ….

  3. March 6, 2017

    Steve LeCroy Reply

    Dr. Levitan,

    Would you consider using one or two NPA’s like naso-flo that can provide supplemental oxygen along with CPAP instead of a cannula and non-rebreather mask?

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603