Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Emergency Department Patient Satisfaction Surveys

By ACEP Now | on August 1, 2012 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Members of the ACEP Emergency Medicine Practice Committee (EMPC) (2010-2012) offer, in this article, information on patient satisfaction surveys including methodologies utilized, limitations of these methodologies, and thoughts on utilization of survey data for emergency physicians when working with hospital leaders on appropriate interpretation of scores and creation of environments conducive to quality care and patient satisfaction.

You Might Also Like
  • A Personal Story of Patient Satisfaction
  • Better Clinical Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction Go Hand in Hand for Emergency Physicians
  • Opinion: Emergency Physicians Should Take Cautious Approach to Incentives that Boost Patient Satisfaction
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 31 – No 08 – August 2012

In service industries, including health care, satisfaction surveying is a common practice. Recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have embraced value-based purchasing as a methodology for apportioning entitlement health care resources, and identified patient satisfaction as a key marker of value. While Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) is based on the inpatient experience, hospital administrators have come to accept the ED as the “front door to the hospital” and expect their emergency medicine physician groups and ED staff to take the issue of patient satisfaction seriously. And yet the ED environment has unique challenges encountered when striving for patient satisfaction targets, including:

  • The need to interact with patients without the benefit of an established physician-patient relationship.
  • The need to inspire confidence and communicate concern for the patient and family in a short period of time.
  • Long waits without the ability to monitor incoming patient flow.
  • A wide range of presenting complaints complicated by diverse health status and demographics (Ann. Emerg. Med. 2000;35:426-34).
  • Boarding of patients awaiting an inpatient bed that profoundly affects both the physical space and the personnel resources available for the ED patients who eventually are treated and discharged home.

ACEP’s Satisfaction Survey Policy

ACEP and the EMPC have worked for the past 2 years to educate members about patient satisfaction surveys and share concerns about measuring satisfaction in the emergency department with survey organizations. A Patient Satisfaction Point/Counterpoint session at Scientific Assembly will look at the validity of surveys and how emergency physicians can use these surveys to improve their practices. Dr. James G. Adams and Dr. Gillian Schmitz lead the discussion at 3 p.m. on Tuesday, Oct. 9. ACEP’s policy statement on patient satisfaction, released in 2010, is as follows:

The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) recognizes that patient satisfaction surveys that are methodologically and statistically sound can be a valid measure of the patient’s perception of health care value and that patient outcome can be related to perceived patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction survey tools should be:

  • Standardized and validated for the average education level of those being surveyed.
  • Administered and tabulated as close to the date of service as possible.
  • A measure of the specific components of service received in the emergency department with discrete data points.
  • Based on a statistically valid sample size free from selection bias.
  • Transparent in the administration and analysis methodologies.
  • Explicit in intended purpose and use.

Due to the difficulty in segregating whether patient satisfaction scores are a result of physician performance or due to demands and restrictions of the current health care system or other factors out of the control of the physician, patient satisfaction methods that have not been validated should not be used for purposes such as credentialing, contract renewal, and incentive bonus programs.

ACEP recommends that the topic of patient satisfaction measurement be incorporated into the Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine.

Survey Methodology

HCAHPS is a CMS-driven process initiated in 2006. It has been described as the first national public and standardized survey that measures the patient’s perception of health care. Prior satisfaction surveys were used internally by hospitals. In contrast, HCAHPS compares hospitals publicly in relation to the patient’s perception of care. It is now being extended to include home health care and physician practices. Currently, the HCAHPS methodology revolves around surveys sent to a sample of adult patients between 48 hours and 6 weeks after discharge. Hospitals may use a survey vendor to acquire data or perform their own survey. The surveys may be performed by telephone, mail, or interactive voice recognition and are offered in different languages. The minimum target is 300 returned surveys per facility per year. HCAHPS excludes:

  • Patients under 18.
  • Patients who died in the hospital.
  • Patients discharged to hospice.
  • Patients discharged with a primary psychiatric diagnosis.
  • Prisoners.
  • Patients with international addresses.
  • “No contact” patients.

There are many private survey companies that measure patient satisfaction, including Press Ganey, Avatar, NRC Picker, Professional Research Consultants (PRC), and Healthstream, among others. While these agencies send surveys to individual patients, data are usually collated for the hospital as an entity, although the data may be targeted to individual practitioners.

Utilization of Survey Results

Obtain the best available data. Because survey companies charge per survey, most hospitals limit the number of patients to be contacted. This leads to one of the biggest concerns by ED practitioners – the small number of survey results in an inadequate tool. The key is in how the data are used. When setting out to collect data, determine the desired outcome. Align the amount of data received with its significance.

Understand the target audience. Understand what your organizational goals are and create target incentives for increasing levels of performance. Of potential interest to hospital administration is research relating ED patient perception and experience with their entire hospital experience (Acad. Emerg. Med. 2008;15:825-31). The ED physician group needs to understand the effects this has on the public perception of the hospital. Patient satisfaction is strongly associated with willingness to return (Ann. Emerg. Med. 2001;38:527-32).

Drive process improvement. Patient satisfaction data are perceptive, and in almost every case affected by the circumstances unique to that particular situation. We must be open to these perceptions, yet cognizant that they may have less capacity to understand the medical decision making behind the scenes. This is where the peer review process becomes so valuable. But don’t under-sell patient perceptions as a tool for driving proper change within our organizations. Our patients can be one of our most valuable resources in pointing out what is working, and what isn’t, within our EDs.

Survey Limitations

With the exception of rare survey systems performed in person and at discharge, satisfaction survey data are not completely random. Most health care satisfaction survey companies do not include patients admitted to the hospital or transferred out of the host hospital. In most cases, those patients receive an inpatient survey. Telephone-based surveys tend to skew the data away from non–English speakers and those who may not have a personal phone. Mail-based surveys eliminate those without permanent addresses and the illiterate. Children have their surveys filled out by parents or caretakers. Institutionalized patients may be unable to complete surveys independently and tend to be underrepresented.

Depending on how surveys are distributed and interpreted, frequent ED utilizers are either over- or underrepresented – commonly, ED surveys are not re-sent out to patients if they have been seen in the same ED within 90 days.

Steps to Improve Satisfaction

  • Greet the patient appropriately to set the tone.
  • Sit down. This shows you are giving full attention.
  • Lower yourself below eye level if possible.
  • Use active listening and open body language. Consider opening with, “What’s your biggest concern?”
  • Know the questions on your EDs patient satisfaction survey and use these words with your patients.
  • Manage expectations. Find out what the patient or family wants, and keep both informed.
  • Control pain.
  • If you discharge, explain what is wrong, what the treatment is, the expected course, and the follow-up.
  • If an admission is required, explain why and what further testing may be needed.
  • Ask at the end of the visit, “What questions do you have for me? Is there anything else I can do for you?”
  • Keep patients informed. This is one of the priority items affecting the patient experience. Every 30 minutes is recommended.
  • Maintain a clean and comfortable environment.
  • Provide diversions (TVs, magazines, books, games for kids, etc.).
  • Call patients after their visit. ED patient callbacks have long been known to improve ED patient satisfaction (Ann. Emerg. Med. 1986;15:911-5). A more recent study reaffirmed this (Dunn L. Four best practices for improving emergency department results. Studer Group Newsletter, Jan. 25, 2010).

Surveys Here to Stay

Patient satisfaction surveys will increasingly be used in health care, with results tied to reimbursement. Satisfaction surveys are one of the few tools available to facilities, administrators, regulatory bodies, and providers to gauge the patient’s perception of care. The current move in health care is toward more transparency with incentives for high performers. ED leaders must be armed with the tools necessary to use survey information in the most productive manner. With a thorough understanding comes a greater ability to interpret the data, educate others, and drive to a better performance.


For the full research article on this topic, go to www.acep.org/patientsatisfaction.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Multi-Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansCMSEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianPatient SafetyPractice ManagementQualityResearch

Related

  • Can This Patient Leave Against Medical Advice?

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Physicians of the Sandwich Generation Face Unique Challenges

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Texas Hospitals Now Must Ask About Immigration Status

    March 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now May 03

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Emergency Department Patient Satisfaction Surveys”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603