Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Current Workplace Laws Offer Protections but Aren’t Optimized for EM

By Andrea Austin, MD, FACEP; and Annahieta Kalantari, DO, FACEP | on September 24, 2019 | 0 Comment
Equity Equation
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
shutterstock.com
shutterstock.com

Emergency physicians take care of patients 24-7-365. Yet we are not immune to life transitions and challenges, including personal and family medical and life events. For too long, family leave has been presented mainly as a women’s issue. In reality, it affects everyone. Today, families are created in various ways: biologically and via surrogacy, adoption, and fostering. Allowing time off only for biological mothers promotes the antiquated idea that caring for children is women’s work; this is both paternalistic and unfair to men (including same-sex male parents) who want to share the parenting load and be home during those special early weeks and months.

You Might Also Like
  • Keep Religion Out of Our Laws
  • ACEP Supports Workplace Violence Prevention Act
  • ACEP Meets with OSHA to Expand Protections from ED Violence
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 38 – No 09 – September 2019

While we all hope to work for groups and organizations that understand this concept and voluntarily commit to practices that promote a fair workplace, it is also important to know the legal protections available for those who require family leave.

Workplace Discrimination Protections

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation), national origin, age (40 or older), disability, or genetic information. Title VII also applies to private and public colleges, universities, and employment agencies.1 When discrimination occurs, physicians have various options to address the problem. It can be reported internally to the organization, for instance with the assistance of human resources or employee-assistance programs. A formal charge can also be placed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).2 A full list of laws enforced by the EEOC can be found at www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/index.cfm.

In 1978, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII to prohibit discrimination on the basis of pregnancy.3 During employment interviews (and, later, during promotion or leadership decision making), inquiring about pregnancy status or future family plans or asking about children is illegal. Such inquiries can lead to civil lawsuits for discriminatory hiring practices. While some of these inquiries are well-intentioned attempts to get to know prospective employees better, some groups have illegally avoided hiring women who have or plan to have children. If the prospective employee brings up the topic, it may be discussed. There are other examples of inappropriate inquiries during interviews and the hiring process, and it is recommended that leaders provide guidelines and training to all personnel involved in the interview and hiring process. At a minimum, all personnel should be familiar with the topics that cannot be asked about during interviews.4

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: DiscriminationFamily and Medical Leave ActMaternity LeaveWorkplace Discrimination

Related

  • Interphysician Weight Bias in the House of Medicine

    November 23, 2021 - 0 Comment
  • Allies, Advocates, and Accomplices Are Critical to Diversity and Inclusion

    October 21, 2019 - 0 Comment
  • Tips for Negotiating Paid Family Leave

    May 18, 2018 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Current Workplace Laws Offer Protections but Aren’t Optimized for EM”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603