Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Should Cricoid Pressure Be Used During Rapid Sequence Intubation?

By Scott D. Weingart, MD, FCCM, and John D. Hinds, MB BCh, BAO | on July 8, 2014 | 4 Comments
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

To his credit, Dr. Hinds did admit to some problems with the medication. Cricolol may make airway management more difficult.4-6 It can prevent endotracheal tube placement once you visualize the cords.7 It lowers the esophageal sphincter tone and increases the potential for regurgitation.8,9 If the medication is dosed too high (a significant risk given the lack of ampule standardization), side effects can include airway fracture and esophageal rupture.10,11

You Might Also Like
  • Rapid Sequence Intubation Pharmacology
  • Timing Resuscitation Sequence Intubation for Critically Ill Patients
  • Is Video or Direct Laryngoscopy Better for Intubation in Trauma Patients?
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 07 – July 2014

Dr. Hinds stressed again that the medication must be administered by your trained airway assistant throughout the whole procedure. He wanted to make sure we understood that the assistant’s full attention must be devoted to medication administration at the exclusion of any other assistance during RSI. He did mention that Cricolol will soon be available in suppository form, which may aid administration.

Anticipating audience questions, Dr. Hinds addressed whether it would be reasonable to start administering Cricolol at the beginning of an intubation and, if it made the airway more difficult, we could simply stop administering it. He strongly warned against this plan, explaining that the drug’s creator had the highest incidence of regurgitation ever reported when he used that strategy.

I don’t think I will be pushing for my hospital to add Cricolol to the formulary.

Message Behind the Joke

All kidding aside, Dr. Hinds’ lecture is a must-watch. You can see it at http://emcrit.org/wee/cricolol.

In summary, cricoid pressure, considered an essential aspect of rapid sequence tracheal intubation when it was first conceived, has come under increasing scrutiny within critical care and emergency medicine.1 Computed tomography and MRI scanning have shown that cricoid pressure causes tracheal compression in 80 percent of patients. Numerous studies have found that cricoid pressure hinders bag-valve-mask device ventilation, increases peak inspiratory pressure, and reduces tidal volumes.1 For the same reasons that the airway obstruction induced by cricoid pressure may preclude effective manual ventilation, it may limit the effectiveness of apneic oxygenation as well. If an assistant’s hand is placed on the patient’s neck, it should be for the sole purpose of assisting with external laryngeal manipulation to allow better glottic exposure.7,12

I do not believe in the use of cricoid pressure for RSI for all of the reasons mentioned above. However, I don’t think you should make this call as an individual doc but instead make a departmental guideline stating that, after a review of the evidence, cricoid pressure seems not helpful and possibly harmful. This will protect all members of your department while allowing excellent patient care.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Airway ManagementCricoidCritical CareEmergency DepartmentEmergency PhysicianIntubationProcedures and Skills

Related

  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Department Management of Prehospital Tourniquets

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

4 Responses to “Should Cricoid Pressure Be Used During Rapid Sequence Intubation?”

  1. July 21, 2014

    EMCrit speaks on cricoid pressure | PHARM Reply

    […] Check it out HERE […]

  2. July 21, 2014

    roadkillchef Reply

    Exactly – if you make the decision NOT to use cricoid force (having read the evidence, as well as being swayed/amused by Doc Hind’s talk), then make sure that are supported by an institutional guideline/SOP….

    …because in the event of an airway catastrophe, it seems inevitable that a prosecution attorney will call upon a crusty old anaesthetist to insist that cricoid force (not pressure) remains a ‘standard of care’.

    Better to have institutional standards, appropriate to the circumstances – bot least recognising that in critical care airway management, ensuring first pass success without desaturation (and omitting cricoid force) takes priority over attempts to reduce aspiration risk via cricoid.

    It’s a no brainer really – bit like advice to use a checklist for ED RSI!

  3. July 21, 2014

    EMCrit Wee - Cricolol by Dr. John Hinds Reply

    […] Here is the conference write-up version in ACEP Now […]

  4. February 4, 2019

    Lance Carter Reply

    I’m not sure that I understand the reasoning. I believe that your reasoning behind not using cricoid pressure is that it may interfere with effective ventilation, correct?

    I don’t understand this, because during an RSI, the patient wont’ be ventilating. They will be asleep and apneic from the induction agent and paralytic, and you won’t be ventilating for them either, because if you do ventilate for them, it is no longer defined as an RSI.

    Therefore, if you’re not going to be ventilating for the patient anyway, why care if cricoid pressure may impede effective ventilation? And why not protect the patient from aspiration? What harm is it going to do an an apneic, non-ventilated patient?

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603