Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Brain Trauma Guidelines for Emergency Medicine

By Andy Jagoda, MD; Ben Bobrow, MD; Al Lulla, MD; Jamshid Ghajar, MD; Greg Hawryluk, MD | on October 3, 2023 | 1 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In April 2023, the third edition of the Brain Trauma Foundation’s evidence-based guidelines for the prehospital management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) was published in Prehospital Emergency Care.1 The practice guidelines were written by a multi-disciplinary group of experts and went through an extensive peer review process. This document is an update of guidelines first published in 2000, and then updated in 2007. These guidelines present the best available evidence to support clinical decision making in the prehospital setting when TBI care may have the most significant impact on outcomes; they also establish a research agenda for future investigations.

You Might Also Like
  • Shift in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Management Improves Care
  • People with Traumatic Brain Injury More Likely To Go To Prison
  • ACEP Clinical Policy on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 42 – No 10 – October 2023
TBI ASSESSMENT

Oxygenation, Blood Pressure, Ventilation

  • Patients with suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI) should be carefully monitored in the prehospital setting for hypoxemia (<90% arterial hemoglobin saturation), hypotension (<100 mmHg systolic blood pressure [SBP]), hypertension (150 mmHg SBP or higher), hyperventilation (end tidal CO2 reading less than 35) and hypo- or hyperthermia.
  • Blood oxygen saturation should be continuously measured in the prehospital setting with a pulse oximeter and supplemental oxygen administered to maintain blood oxygen saturation above 90%.
  • Systolic and diastolic blood pressure should be measured in the prehospital setting using the most accurate method available and should be measured frequently (every 5-10 min) or monitored continuously if possible.
  • Ventilation should be assessed in the prehospital setting for all patients with an altered level of consciousness with continuous capnography to maintain end tidal CO2 values between 35 and 45 mmHg.
  • Temperature should be measured in the prehospital setting and efforts should be undertaken to maintain euthermia in the patient equating to temperatures of 36-37 degrees Celsius.
  • In non-resource-limited settings, appropriately sized equipment to measure oxygenation, blood pressure, and temperature in children and adults should be maintained and available for routine use by trained prehospital professionals.

Glasgow Coma Scale Score

  • The adult protocol for standard GCS measurement should be followed in children over 2 years of age. In pre-verbal children, the P-GCS should be employed.
  • The GCS score should be reported every 30 minutes in the prehospital setting and whenever there is a change in mental status to identify improvement or deterioration over time. Confounders to the GCS such as seizure and post-ictal phase, ingestions and drug overdose, as well as medications administered in the prehospital setting that impact GCS score should be documented.
  • The GCS must be obtained through interaction with the patient (i.e., by giving verbal directions or, for patients unable to follow commands, by applying a painful stimulus such as nail bed pressure or axillary pinch).
  • The GCS should be measured after airway, breathing, and circulation are assessed, after a clear airway is established, and after necessary ventilatory or circulatory resuscitation has been performed.
  • The GCS should be measured prior to administering sedative or paralytic agents when possible and when not delaying airway stabilization, or after these drugs have been metabolized as they may obscure correct scoring.
  • The GCS should be measured by prehospital professionals who are appropriately trained in how to administer the GCS to both adults and children.
  • The GCS of the prehospital patient, including any changes in score, should be communicated to receiving facilities during all communications and upon arrival.
  • Prehospital assessment of neurologic status using the Simplified Motor Score (SMS), or the isolated motor component of the GCS may provide similar diagnostic and prognostic utility to the complete GCS in adults and may be used in trauma systems organized to incorporate these measures.

Pupil Examination

Pupils should be assessed in the prehospital setting after the patient has been resuscitated and stabilized, with the examination recorded and relayed to the receiving facility. When assessing pupils, the following should be examined for and documented:

  • Evidence of orbital and ocular trauma
  • Comparison of left and right pupillary findings. Clinically significant asymmetry is defined as > 1mm difference in diameter
  • Presence of unilateral or bilateral dilated pupil(s)
  • Presence of fixed and dilated pupil(s). A fixed pupil is defined as < 1mm response to bright light
  • Confounders to pupil exam

TBI is a major public health concern and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for both children and adults. There are at least 600 TBI-related hospitalizations and 175 TBI-related deaths per day.2,3 TBI outcomes are profoundly linked to the timing and quality of care provided before patients reach the hospital. Continuous cerebral blood flow is paramount and brief episodes of systemic hypotension, hypoxia, or inadvertent iatrogenic hyperventilation have been strongly associated with worse outcomes in both children and adults.4 Similar to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the actions of prehospital providers have enormous impact on survival and the degree of any long-term disability. Prehospital providers must be competent and proficient in both the recognition and the seamless management of TBI, as well as facile in determining the most appropriate receiving facility for the acutely brain injured patient.

Prognosis from brain injury results not only from the initial or primary injury, but also from secondary injury that occurs after the event, mainly, hypoxic/ischemic brain injury from under resuscitation or cerebral edema from the release of neurotoxic inflammatory mediators. These guidelines are designed to minimize secondary injury and thus maximize survival by addressing the actions that take place during that critical time from the primary event to arrival at the hospital.

This guideline revision is particularly timely as EMS systems have shown their abilities to dramatically improve survival and neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest, STEMI, acute stroke, and other time-sensitive conditions.

In creating these guidelines, the author team utilized a rigorous grading of the published evidence and provided detailed evidentiary tables that support the recommendations. Terminology used include Strength (rating of strong vs. weak) and Quality of Evidence (high, moderate, or low). These designations take into account not only the class of the evidence based on study design but also design flaws that weaken a study’s internal or external validity.

The recommendations in the first two editions of these guidelines were all graded as “weak” due to the lack of high-quality evidence. Since the last edition, evidence has grown supporting an outcome benefit of interventions; specifically, the statewide Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) initiative from Arizona which documented an outcome benefit for patients with moderate and severe TBI when prehospital treatment guidelines were followed.4 In addition, a number of meta-analyses have produced a higher level of evidence that consequently support a “strong” recommendation in several areas where the recommendation was rated “weak” in prior guideline editions.

The recommendations in the guidelines are divided into sections pertaining to “Assessment”, “Treatment” and “Decision Making”: Chapters within these sections are uniformly structured to include Recommendations, Evidence Tables, Scientific Foundations, and Key Issues for Future Investigation, and References. The following is a summary of the guidelines; An algorithm that synthesizes best practice recommendations based on the guidelines is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2023.2187905 and from the Brain Trauma Foundation.

SUMMARY

The Brain Trauma Foundation’s guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury patients provide evidence-based recommendations for assessment, treatment, and transport decisions. The guidelines emphasize the importance of monitoring and treatment of airway, oxygenation, and ventilation, with caution against hyperventilation and recommendations for the use of ETCO2 to ensure appropriate ventilation. Close monitoring of oxygenation and blood pressure is also stressed, with interventions recommended based on the results of this monitoring. The guidelines also address issues related to EMS provider skill level, transportation modality, and destination for the patient. The recommendations are applicable to all types of EMS systems.

__________________________

Dr. Jagoda is professor and chair emeritus of emergency medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Dr. Bobrow is professor and chair of the McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston department of emergency medicine and The John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern distinguished chair in emergency medicine.

Dr. Lulla is an assistant professor of emergency medicine in the Department of Emergency Medicine within the Division of Emergency Medical Services, Disaster and Global Health at UT Southwestern Medical Center.

Dr. Ghajar is president and founder of the Brain Trauma Foundation at the Stanford Brain Performance Center.

Dr. Hawryluk is a neurosurgeon at Cleveland Clinic and medical director of the Brain Trauma Foundation.

TBI TREATMENT

Airway, Ventilation, and Oxygenation

  • All patients with suspected severe TBI should be placed on continuous oxygen supplementation via nasal cannula or face mask in the prehospital setting in order to minimize secondary insults related to hypoxia.
  • Hypoxemia (oxygen saturation [SpO2] < 90%) should be monitored using continuous pulse oximetry and corrected immediately upon identification by 1) ensuring appropriate airway positioning and 2) administering continuous, supplemental oxygen.
  • If signs of hypoxia persist (central cyanosis and/or hypoxemia on pulse oximetry) despite increasing the flow and concentration of continuous supplemental oxygen, the following stepwise strategies should be undertaken with re-evaluation of oxygen saturation and respiratory effort following each strategy:
    • airway re-positioning,
    • positive pressure ventilation as with bag-valve-mask ventilation in conjunction with appropriate airway adjuncts (e.g., oropharyngeal airway), and/or
    • supraglottic airway or endotracheal intubation by a trained health care professional.
  • An airway should be established, by the most appropriate means available, in patients who have signs of severe TBI, GCS < 9, or 9 and decompensating, the inability to maintain an adequate airway, or if hypoxemia is not corrected by supplemental oxygen.
  • Emergency Medical Service (EMS) systems implementing endotracheal intubation protocols including the use of rapid sequence intubation (RSI) protocols should confirm endotracheal tube placement in the trachea by the presence of bilateral breath sounds on auscultation, ETCO2 detection and/or capnography. Intubated patients in the prehospital setting require continuously monitored oxygenation, ETCO2, and frequent blood pressure monitoring.
  • Patients requiring respiratory support with positive pressure ventilation should be maintained with normal breathing rates (approximately 10 breaths per minute with ETCO2 35-45 mmHg), and hyperventilation (ETCO2 < 35 mmHg) should be avoided. Ventilatory adjuncts such as pressure-controlled bags, ventilation-rate timers, ETCO2 monitoring, and ventilators should be used to support appropriate ventilation and minimize the risk of secondary insults by avoiding hypo- and hyperventilation.

Fluid Resuscitation

  • Intravenous fluids should be administered in the prehospital setting to treat hypotension and/or limit hypotension to the shortest duration possible.
  • Hypotensive patients should be treated with blood products and/or isotonic fluids in the prehospital setting.
  • Hypertonic fluid resuscitation may be administered to patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale Score (GCS) < 8 in whom increased ICP is suspected in the prehospital setting.

Hyperventilation and Hyperosmolar Therapy for Suspected Increased Intracranial Pressure (ICP)

  • Hyperventilation should be avoided in the prehospital care of children and adults with TBI in the absence of signs of active cerebral herniation.
  • Ventilation strategies should target eucapnia and avoid hypocapnia (i.e., ETCO2 of 35- 40) and be monitored using capnography.
  • When used to address signs of active and imminent herniation, hyperventilation should target an ETCO2 of 30-35 using capnography.
  • Hyperosmolar therapy should not be administered for the prophylactic treatment of suspected elevated ICP, with or without signs of cerebral herniation, in the prehospital setting at this time.
  • Prehospital administration of TXA therapy is not generally and widely indicated for the prophylactic treatment of suspected ICH or elevated ICP at this time.

References

  1. Lulla A, et al. Prehospital Guidelines for the management of traumatic brain injury – 3rd edition. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2023.2187905.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics: Mortality Data on CDC WONDER. Accessed 2022, https://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd.html.
  3. Bell JM, Breiding MJ, DePadilla L. CDC’s efforts to improve traumatic brain injury surveillance. J Safety Res. 2017;62:253 -256.
  4. Spaite DW, Bobrow BJ, Keim SM, et al. Association of Statewide Implementation of the Prehospital Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment Guidelines With Patient Survival Following Traumatic Brain Injury: The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) Study. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(7):e191152.
DECISION-MAKING WITHIN THE EMS SYSTEM

Dispatch and Destination, On-scene, and Transportation

  • All regions should have an organized trauma care system with comprehensive documentation of each encounter including time, assessment, and care provided.
  • Emergency Medical Services (EMS) should establish specific protocols directing destination decisions for patients with suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI).
    • Pediatric patients with suspected TBI should be treated in a pediatric trauma center or in an adult trauma center with added qualifications

      to treat children in preference to a Level I or II adult trauma center without added qualifications for pediatric treatment.

  • Patients with suspected moderate-severe TBI should be transported directly to a facility with immediately available computed tomography (CT) neuroimaging capabilities, prompt neurosurgical care, and the ability to monitor intracranial pressure and treat intracranial hypertension.
    • While direct transport to a trauma center is preferable for most patients, in the event that this transport is not possible, stabilization at a non-trauma center with subsequent transfer within an established trauma system may occur.
    • In a metropolitan area, pediatric patients with severe TBI should be transported directly to a pediatric trauma center if available.
    • The mode of transport should be selected to minimize the time to definitive interventions for the patient with TBI.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Multi-Page

Topics: ClinicalGuidelinesTrauma & InjuryTraumatic Brain Injury

Related

  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Department Management of Prehospital Tourniquets

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP’s October 2025 Poll: How Often Do You Read Your Own X-Rays?

    September 30, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

One Response to “Brain Trauma Guidelines for Emergency Medicine”

  1. April 9, 2025

    Cristopher Astudillo Reply

    Me pareció interesante. Una información bastante valiosa para el tratamiento de TCE.

    Con cuerdo mucho con uno de los partidos que dice “El tratamiento inmediato del TCE, desde la APH da una buena probabilidad de vida a los pacientes” es algo fundamental para prevenir lesiones secundarias y mejorar el tiempo de recuperación del paciente.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603