Second, a nearly ubiquitous belief exists that anticoagulation is withheld or reversed for CDT.7 In fact, anticoagulation is continued during CDT and can include LMWH.9,10 Similarly, use of LMWH does not preclude salvage thrombolytic use. The TOPCOAT trial, evaluating tenecteplase for intermediate-risk PE, protocolized the use of LMWH prior to thrombolysis, switching patients started on UFH to a LMWH.11 Most patients hospitalized with PE undergo neither CDT nor thrombolysis and, even if they do, administration of LMWH is not a contraindication. Although we may worry about the potential for decompensation and don’t want to preclude advanced therapies, this fear should not motivate us to choose UFH over a LMWH for most patients.
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: March 02In addition, a circular pattern of deference of anticoagulant choice exists within the hospital spectrum of care. In the qualitative study, emergency physicians revealed choosing UFH over LMWH not only because this is how they were trained and the inertia of their practice pattern, but also to allow more flexibility to the inpatient team. Hospital medicine clinicians revealed that even if they preferred an alternative to UFH, they were unlikely to change the anticoagulant until preparation for discharge. Hospitalists cited not wanting to “second guess” the emergency physician and the hassle of multiple changes in anticoagulation regimens as reasons they continued UFH use in these cases.7
Unfractionated heparin has a role in a select minority of patients with acute PE, largely in patients on vasopressors who may have impaired subcutaneous absorption of LMWH, those who are actively bleeding or are imminently undergoing invasive surgical procedures, and those with severe renal dysfunction in whom renally dosed LMWH or DOACs are contraindicated. However, these exceptions account for a minority of patients hospitalized with PE. It’s time to dispel the myths associated with UFH and embrace alternatives as the default, reserving UFH for a much narrower subset of patients with PE.
Dr. Westafer (@Lwestafer) is an attending physician and research fellow at Baystate Medical Center, clinical instructor at the University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, and co-host of FOAMcast.
References
- Khor YH, Smith R, McDonald CF. Suboptimal management of unfractionated heparin compared with low-molecular-weight heparin in the management of pulmonary embolism. Intern Med J. 2014;44(4):339-344.
- Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e419S-e496S.
- Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Respir J. 2019;54(3):1901647.
- Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(43):3033-3080.
- Westafer LM, Presti T, Shieh M-S, et al. Trends in initial anticoagulation among US patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism 2011-2020. Ann Emerg Med. 2024;84(5):518-529.
- Jiménez D, De Miguel-Díez J, Guijarro R, et al. Trends in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Analysis from the RIETE Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(2):162-170.
- Stubblefield WB, Helderman R, Strokes N, et al. Factors in initial anticoagulation choice in hospitalized patients with pulmonary embolism. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(1):e2452877.
- Nutescu EA, Burnett A, Fanikos J, et al. Pharmacology of anticoagulants used in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016;41(1):15-31.
- Pruszczyk P, Klok FA, Kucher N, et al. Percutaneous treatment options for acute pulmonary embolism: a clinical consensus statement by the ESC Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention. 2022;18(8):e623-e638.
- Rivera-Lebron B, McDaniel M, Ahrar K, et al. Diagnosis, treatment and follow up of acute pulmonary embolism: Consensus practice from the PERT consortium. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019;25:1076029619853037.
- Kline JA, Nordenholz KE, Courtney DM, et al. Treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism with tenecteplase or placebo: cardiopulmonary outcomes at 3 months: multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12(4):459-468.
Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page




One Response to “Anticoagulant Selection Is Cornerstone of Pulmonary Embolism Treatment”
March 23, 2025
David McClellanThis comment is true as far as it goes LMWH would certainly be better than unfractionated heparin in most cases. I think giving short shift to the Dorax is a serious deficiency. Using DOACs enables you to briefly observe the patient in the emergency department to send them home with lower risk, pulmonary embolism and almost all other VT’s with quite significant safety as has been previously proven and numerous studies.