Logo

Latest News

  • E-scooter Injuries Rising, Often Involve Drugs or Alcohol
  • Diagnostic Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation Tied to Higher Cancer Risk in Kids
Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Practice Management
    • Benchmarking
    • Reimbursement & Coding
    • Care Team
    • Legal
    • Operations
    • Quality & Safety
  • Public Policy
    • Advocacy
    • Health Reform
    • Medicare & Medicaid
    • Regulation
  • Technology
    • EMR
    • Health IT
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Innovation
  • Career
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Opinion
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Multimedia
    • Events
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
    • EM Career Central
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Authors
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

American Academy of Pediatrics Recommendations for Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (Formerly Apparent Life-Threatening Events) and Evaluation of Lower-Risk Infants

By Graham Ingalsbe, MD; Sharon Mace, MD, FACEP, FAAP; and Jonathan Valente, MD, FACEP | on January 3, 2018 | 0 Comment
Uncategorized
  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

The ACEP Clinical Policies Committee regularly reviews guidelines published by other organizations and professional societies. Periodically, new guidelines are identified on topics with relevance to the clinical practice of emergency medicine. This article highlights recommendations for management of a brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) developed by the American Academy of Pediatrics.1

You Might Also Like
  • The ED Management of Pediatric Apparent Life-Threatening Events
  • Summary of 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients with Syncope
  • ACEP15 Session: Recognizing Life-Threatening Rashes in Pediatric Patients

Working a pediatric shift between a steady stream of upper respiratory infections and gastroenteritis, you encounter a 4-month-old brought in by her parents with a chief complaint of an apparent life-threatening event (ALTE). The parents, appropriately tearful, nervous, and concerned, describe a 30-second episode of their baby going floppy, breathing irregularly, and then recovering back to her normal self. The infant has not had any prior episodes like this, was born full-term, and looks great in your examination. You consider the diagnosis of ALTE. The incidence of ALTE is roughly 0.6 percent to 0.8 percent of all emergency department visits in children younger than 1 year of age, and this diagnosis accounts for about 2.27 percent of pediatric hospitalizations.2 In an effort to improve care for this group of patients, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) developed a guideline with specific recommendations for the workup and management of low-risk pediatric patients with a presentation consistent with ALTE. The objectives of the guideline include replacing the term ALTE with BRUE, outlining an approach to patients presenting with a BRUE, and management recommendations.

The guideline authors provided a definition of a BRUE, which includes length of the episode, the patient being back to baseline normal, there being no other diagnosis to explain it, and the infant having one or more symptoms related to change in status during the episode. If a patient is well appearing and the presentation is consistent with the definition of a BRUE, then a complete history and physical exam must be performed to determine appropriate and negative history and physical exam features. If there is an explanation for the event, then the event is not a BRUE. If there is no clear explanation in a low-risk child, then a BRUE diagnosis can be made.

Once the diagnosis of a BRUE is made, a patient must then be assessed as low- or high-risk for an adverse event or recurrence as well as for symptoms that have a potentially dangerous cause. If there are concerning historical and/or exam features (eg, family history of sudden death, developmental delay, social concerns), then the patient would be categorized as higher-risk and is considered “outside of the guideline scope” for a low-risk BRUE. The AAP guideline provides inclusion criteria for low-risk patients.

For a patient who falls into a low-risk category, the guideline authors developed 29 separate action statements. Each of these action statements were graded with a specific level of evidence quality rating (A, B, C, or D, with A being the highest and D being the lowest rating). An overall strength of the recommendation was provided also (strong, moderate, or weak).

Only one of the action statements was rated as a “strong” recommendation: 4A. Should not obtain a white blood cell count, blood culture, or cerebrospinal fluid analysis or culture to detect an occult bacterial infection (Level B; strong recommendation). Table 51

Some examples of management recommendations particularly pertinent to emergency medicine are that low-risk patients do not have to be admitted solely for continuous monitoring, imaging is not mandatory, and an electrocardiogram is worth considering.

While it would be exhaustive to present every action statement from the guideline, emergency medicine providers should know that this guideline exists and recommends a minimalist workup in the low-risk patient meeting criteria for a BRUE. It cannot be stressed enough that the determination of a low-risk patient by this guideline is based on a very extensive history and physical examination with more than 75 separate historical features and physical examination findings/considerations highlighted in the guideline tables. In patients determined to be a low-risk BRUE, discharge home after minimal or no workup with a detailed, timely follow-up plan and return precautions is a safe and reasonable disposition. Shared decision making should be employed with the family, emergency provider, and primary care provider.

References

  1. Tieder JS, Bonkowsky JL, Etzel RA, et al; for the Subcommittee on Apparent Life Threatening Events. Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (formerly Apparent Life-Threatening Events) and evaluation of lower-risk infants. Pediatrics. 2016;137(5):e20160590.
  2. McGovern MC, Smith MB. Causes of apparent life threatening events in infants: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89:1043-1048.

Dr. Ingalsbe is clinical assistant professor of emergency medicine at the University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine.

Dr. Mace is professor of medicine at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University and director of research at the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio.

Dr. Valente is associate professor in the departments of emergency medicine and pediatrics at the Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, and Hasbro Children’s Hospital, all in Providence, Rhode Island.

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Topics: GuidelinesPediatrics

Related

  • Pediatric Pearls Highlight Annual Literature Review

    October 28, 2019 - 0 Comment
  • Is There a Link Between Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Obesity in Kids?

    October 15, 2019 - 0 Comment
  • Diagnostic Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation Tied to Higher Cancer Risk in Kids

    October 2, 2019 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP_1119_cover-image

ACEP Now: Vol 38 – No 11 – November 2019

Read More

No Responses to “American Academy of Pediatrics Recommendations for Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (Formerly Apparent Life-Threatening Events) and Evaluation of Lower-Risk Infants”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
© 2019. All Rights Reserved. ISSN 2333-2603
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.