Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Legal
      • Operations
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Compensation Reports
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • By the Numbers
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • mTBI Resource Center
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • Issue Archives
  • Archives
    • Brief19
    • Coding Wizard
    • Images in EM
    • Care Team
    • Quality & Safety
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Acute Headache: Don’t Forget the Physical Exam

By John Bedolla, MD, FACEP, FAAEM | on February 26, 2026 | 0 Comment
Medicolegal Mind
Share:  Print-Friendly Version

Patients presenting with a primary or secondary complaint of acute headache represent a persistent source of malpractice claims and lawsuits.¹ They are especially costly, because they can result in death and lifelong disability.² Although the value of noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) brain imaging for evaluating headache is undisputable, over-reliance on a negative NCCT can lead to a serious miss and a lawsuit.3,⁴ Consider adding more historical detail, a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), meningeal signs, and funduscopic examination to the physical exam in selected patients with acute headache.

You Might Also Like
  • Focus On: Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Readers Respond: How Not to Miss Posterior Circulation Stroke
  • Can Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule Determine which Headache Patients Need More Tests?
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: March 2026

Legal Background

In studies of misdiagnosis and closed lawsuits, over-reliance on a negative CT and missing history and physical exam elements are cited as causes.1 The most common claims are for subarachnoid hemorrhage, stroke, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), and meningitis/encephalitis.4 The most common theory advanced by the plaintiff is that, had the defendant done a more thorough history and physical (H&P) exam, it would have triggered further testing and the condition would have been caught. It can be a challenge to convince a jury that additional physical examination should not have been done when a catastrophic result occurs.

Medical Background

Given the unmodifiable constraints of time and resources in the emergency department, it is not possible to perform every element of the H&P.5 However, there are selected features clinicians may choose to add to better cover subtle or atypical presentations.

Historical Features

Delineating the exact time of onset and rapidity of onset are particularly valuable with regard to subarachnoid hemorrhage. If the timing can be accurately established at less than six hours, a negative CT comes very close to ruling out subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).3 Detailing that the time to maximal onset exceeds one hour is also helpful.6 The presence or absence of neurological symptoms, including posterior circulation features such as dizziness, imbalance, and new visual disturbances can help point to stroke as a potential cause, because approximately 40 percent of posterior circulation strokes present with headache as a primary or secondary complaint.7 Fourteen percent of anterior circulation strokes do so as well.8

NIHSS

The NIHSS can be a valuable tool, because a significant percentage of these conditions can present with subtle neurological deficits, particularly stroke. Approximately 10 percent of SAH, a significant percentage of strokes, and roughly 17 to 43 percent of CVST can present with both acute headache and subtle neurological deficits.9,10 In the first four to six hours, the NIHSS may be more sensitive than MRI for stroke, because an NIHSS score of zero does not exclude stroke and early diffusion-weighted MRI may be falsely negative.11,12 I don’t recommend NIHSS for every patient with acute headache, but in selected cases it’s of high value and can be performed quickly.

Meningeal Signs

Although meningeal signs are often taught to be insensitive, consider adding them anyway. If positive, they may trigger further workup. If negative, they contribute to a defensible record in the event of a catastrophic outcome. Approximately 60 percent of subarachnoid hemorrhage and about 50 percent of meningitis cases present with positive meningeal signs.13,14

Fundoscopy

Checking for the presence or absence of papilledema may seem daunting, but with practice fundoscopy can be done quickly. Twenty to 30 percent of CVST cases present with papilledema.15

Summary

The NCCT brain is a valuable tool for evaluating patients with acute headache, and this is one reason its use has increased significantly over the past two decades.16 But the H&P remains essential. Adding targeted elements to the history and physical exam can improve diagnostic sensitivity for subtle but catastrophic disease and make your care more defensible. Studies show that patients value thoroughness and often rate clinicians higher when they perceive a more complete examination.17,18


Dr. Bedolla is the national director of risk science at US Acute Care Solutions, and an assistant professor at the University of Texas Dell Medical School.

 

References

  1. A Dose of Insight: Emergency Department. Coverys Web site. https://www.coverys.com/. Accessed February 6, 2026.
  2. Brown TW, McCarthy ML, Kelen GD, Levy F. An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers.
  3. Perry JJ, Stiell IG, Sivilotti ML, et al. Sensitivity of computed tomography performed within six hours of onset of headache for diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage: prospective cohort study.BMJ. 2011;343:d4277. Published 2011 July 18. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4277
  4. Newman-Toker DE, Nassery N, Schaffer AC, et al. Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA.BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;33(2):109-120. Published 2024 January 19. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014130
  5. Morley C, Unwin M, Peterson GM, Stankovich J, Kinsman L. Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions.PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0203316. Published 2018 August 30. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203316
  6. Perry JJ, Sivilotti MLA, Émond M, et al. Prospective Implementation of the Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule and 6-Hour Computed Tomography Rule.Stroke. 2020;51(2):424-430. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026969
  7. Nouh A, Remke J, Ruland S. Ischemic posterior circulation stroke: a review of anatomy, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and current management.Front Neurol. 2014;5:30. Published 2014 April 7. doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00030
  8. Kumral E, Bogousslavsky J, Van Melle G, Regli F, Pierre P. Headache at stroke onset: the Lausanne Stroke Registry.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58(4):490-492. doi:10.1136/jnnp.58.4.490
  9. Behrouz R, Birnbaum LA, Jones PM, Topel CH, Misra V, Rabinstein AA. Focal Neurological Deficit at Onset of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Frequency and Causes.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(11):2644-2647. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.07.009
  10. Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD Jr, et al. Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.Stroke. 2011;42(4):1158-1192. doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e31820a8364
  11. Martin-Schild S, Albright KC, Tanksley J, et al. Zero on the NIHSS does not equal the absence of stroke.Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(1):42-45. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.06.564
  12. Edlow BL, Hurwitz S, Edlow JA. Diagnosis of DWI-negative acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis.Neurology. 2017;89(3):256-262. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004120
  13. Cohen-Gadol AA, Bohnstedt BN. Recognition and evaluation of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and ruptured cerebral aneurysm.Am Fam Physician. 2013;88(7):451-456.
  14. Niemelä S, Lempinen L, Löyttyniemi E, Oksi J, Jero J. Bacterial meningitis in adults: a retrospective study among 148 patients in an 8-year period in a university hospital, Finland.BMC Infect Dis. 2023;23(1):45. Published January 23, 2023. doi:10.1186/s12879-023-07999-2
  15. Tanislav C, Siekmann R, Sieweke N, et al. Cerebral vein thrombosis: clinical manifestation and diagnosis. BMC Neurol. 2011;11:69. Published June 10, 2011. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-11-69
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. QuickStats: Annual Percentage of Emergency Department Visits with Selected Imaging Tests Ordered or Provided — National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, United States, 2001–2010. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6222a6.htm. Accessed February 6, 2026.
  17. Duan L, Mukherjee EM, Federman DG. The physical examination: a survey of patient preferences and expectations during primary care visits. Postgrad Med. 2020;132(1):102-108. doi:10.1080/00325481.2020.1713618
  18. 18. Boudreaux ED, O’Hea EL. Patient satisfaction in the Emergency Department: a review of the literature and implications for practice. 

Topics: Acute Headacheand Defensible Medicine.Cerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisComputed TomographyMalpracticeMedicolegal ConcernsMeningitisPhysical ExamStrokeSubarachnoid Hemorrhage

Related

  • Pediatric Torticollis: A Simple Emergency Department Approach

    January 7, 2026 - 0 Comment
  • The Renewed Necessity of Robust Clinical Judgment in CT Scan Utilization

    December 10, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • How Evidence-Based Medicine Strengthens Your Malpractice Defense

    October 28, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Read More

No Responses to “Acute Headache: Don’t Forget the Physical Exam”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*



Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603