Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACS In the Pregnant Patient

By Howard Roemer, MD, Loren Brown, MD, Vern L. Katz, MD, and Talla Rouson, MD | on November 1, 2012 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

PCI: As in non-pregnancy, heparin and clopidogrel are given prior to procedure. Bare metal stents are preferred to drug eluting stents because the risk of stent thrombosis is lower when clopidogrel has to be stopped for delivery. Aspirin should be continued. Fetal radiation dose from PCI is low. One study showed if maternal back and abdomen are protected and the area is coned down, increased risk to the fetus of dying of cancer within 15 years from 60 minutes is ~1:80000. Another states that coronary angiography exposes patients to 2.5-5.0 mSv and PCI exposes patients to 5.0-15.0 mSv, which are both below the threshold for teratogenicity at any gestational age. Care should be taken during the procedure due to fragility of vascular structures and risk of coronary dissection.

You Might Also Like
  • Sepsis in Pregnancy
  • Lack of Data for Evaluating Venothromboembolic Disease In Pregnant Patients Leaves Physicians Looking for Best Approach
  • Her Chief Complaint Is … And She’s Pregnant
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 31 – No 11 – November 2012

Thrombolysis: If PCI is not available, then treatment should continue as in the non-pregnant patient. There is little data on thrombolysis for MI in pregnancy. These medications are unlikely to cross to the placenta but have been associated with first-trimester pregnancy loss, preterm labor, maternal hemorrhage, abruption placenta, and fetal death. In comparison, complication rate for thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism is only 1%. Generally these patients should be considered for lytic therapy, if timely PCI is not available.

CABG: A small amount of information is available for CABG in pregnancy. However, one study states that maternal mortality from cardiopulmonary bypass surgery is up to 13% and the risk of fetal loss is near 30%.

Post-Cardiac Arrest Hypothermia: For the non pregnant post arrest patient, this therapy has become one accepted standard intervention. The data on use in pregnancy is limited but some hospital protocols may list pregnancy as a contraindication. Many clinicians follow the dictum that saving the mother takes precedence over potential risks to the fetus. Therefore, they will initiate therapeutic hypothermia in these patients. Consider proactively discussing this issue with your perinatology, OB, cardiology consultants to optimize hospital protocols to address this situation.

A pertinent letter was in 2011 New England Journal of Medicine:: In a review of therapeutic hypothermia in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest, Holzer includes pregnancy as a contraindication to hypothermia. Successful induced hypothermia after cardiac arrest in a pregnant woman at 13 weeks of gestation, with subsequent term delivery and normal development of her newborn, has been reported. Also, intraoperative hypothermia administered during cardiac surgery in pregnant women with successful delivery of the fetuses has been described. Varying degrees of hypothermia were used during these operations, with similar positive outcomes. There are theoretical risks to the fetus. In one study, fetal death occurred in up to 24% of mothers undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass with the concurrent use of hypothermia; however, whether this rate of death was attributed to hypothermia or the stress of cardiac surgery with hypothermia remains unknown.Induced hypothermia improves neurologic morbidity and mortality. Conversely, no evidence exists to support harm associated with hypothermia during pregnancy, and evidence does exist to suggest the safety of this practice. Thus, we believe that the potential benefit of induced hypothermia outweighs the theoretical but unproven risks to the fetus, mother, or both.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: CardiovascularClinical GuidelineDiagnosisEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianInternal MedicineOB/GYNObstetricsPharmaceuticalsPregnancy

Related

  • November 2025 News from the College

    November 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Code Eclampsia: Navigating the Storm in ED Management

    August 25, 2025 - 2 Comments
  • August 2025 News from the College

    August 4, 2025 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “ACS In the Pregnant Patient”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603