Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP’s stroke policy fuels discussion and debate

By Kevin Klauer, D.O. & By Andy S. Jagoda, M.D. | on April 1, 2013 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

It does say IV tPA should be considered in acute ischemic stroke patients who meet ECASS III inclusion/exclusion criteria and can be treated between 3 to 4.5 hours after symptom onset; however, the effectiveness of tPA is less well established in institutions without the systems in place to safely administer the medication (Level B recommendation).

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP to Reconsider Clinical Policy on Use of Intravenous tPA to Manage Acute Ischemic Stroke in the ED
  • Recommendation to Update tPA Policy Approved by ACEP Board
  • ACEP Clinical Policy on Intravenous Tissue Plasmogen for Stroke Continues to Evolve
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 32 – No 04 – April 2013

ACEP worked with AAN on this joint policy at the urging of members of both organizations. It reflects more than 8 years of work by a task force that was sensitive to the controversies but committed to an unbiased analysis of the literature.


Dr. Jagoda is professor and chair, the department of emergency medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and medical director of the emergency department at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, N.Y. He was part of the development panel for the IV tPA clinical policy and is a member of the ACEP News Editorial Advisory Board.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPACEP CouncilAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansClinical GuidelineCommentaryCritical CareEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianPoint/CounterpointStroke

Related

  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • November 2025 News from the College

    November 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “ACEP’s stroke policy fuels discussion and debate”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603