Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP’s Clinical Policy on Acute Ischemic Stroke

By Bruce Lo, MD, MBA, RDMS, FACEP | on May 9, 2024 | 0 Comment
Clinical Policy
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The clinical policy on the management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute ischemic stroke, was approved by the ACEP Board of Directors in April 2023.

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP to Reconsider Clinical Policy on Use of Intravenous tPA to Manage Acute Ischemic Stroke in the ED
  • New ACEP Clinical Policy on Transient Ischemic Attack
  • New ACEP Clinical Policy on Transient Ischemic Attack
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 05 – May 2024

Developed by the ACEP Clinical Policies Committee, the guidance was published in the August 2023 issue of the Annals of Emergency Medicine. You can find it on ACEP’s website, www.acep.org/clincialpolicies, as well as in the ECRI Guidelines Trust.

Approximately 800,000 people in the United States are diagnosed with a stroke each year at an estimated cost of approximately 46 billion dollars. As a result, stroke remains one of the leading causes of death, as well as the leading cause of disability. Nearly 30 percent of all patients with an acute ischemic stroke have a large vessel occlusions (LVO), whereas 12 percent of acute stroke patients are thought to be candidates for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Because timely access to the expertise and resources needed to perform EVT is limited for much of the U.S. population, question one examines the use of out-of-hospital decision aids to assist in identifying suspected LVO patients who may be candidates for EVT.

Diagnosing an acute stroke patient with an LVO who may be a candidate for EVT requires advanced imaging, such as computed tomography angiography (CTA). However, identifying which suspected stroke patients are likely to have an LVO can be challenging. This has implications for determining who should receive advanced imaging, such as a CTA, in the ED or potentially be diverted to an EVT-capable stroke center. Question two examines the addition of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) to CTA or MRA to identify patients more likely to benefit from thrombectomy.

Recently, there has been interest in the use of tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke. Question three compares the published literature comparing the safety and effectiveness of tenecteplase versus alteplase.

Finally, patients who present with dizziness can present a diagnostic challenge to emergency physicians trying to differentiate a peripheral from a central cause. Although the rate of misdiagnosis of stroke in patients who are discharged home from the ED with a diagnosis of peripheral vertigo is less than 0.2 percent, up to 37 percent of posterior circulation strokes are missed on initial presentation. Because the mortality of a missed posterior circulation stroke can be significantly higher than those with cerebellar strokes in general, Question four examines the strategies that are needed to prevent misdiagnosis.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Acute Ischemic StrokeClinicalClinical GuidelinesClinical PolicyCritical Careischemic strokeStroke

Related

  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Department Management of Prehospital Tourniquets

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “ACEP’s Clinical Policy on Acute Ischemic Stroke”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603