Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Value of Home Pulse Oximetry in Mild Bronchiolitis Questioned

By Megan Brooks (Reuters Health) | on April 7, 2016 | 0 Comment
Uncategorized
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Among the 75 infants with desaturations, 59 (79 percent) had desaturation to 80 percent or less for at least one minute and 29 (39 percent) had desaturation to 70 percent or less for at least one minute.

You Might Also Like
  • Coding for Pulse Oximetry
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines Updated for Diagnosing, Treating Pediatric Bronchiolitis
  • Pediatric Bronchiolitis, Croup Treatment Tips for Emergency Physicians

“So about two-thirds of the kids desaturated and the majority . . . met criteria for major desaturation,” Dr. Schuh said. Despite this, the rate of unscheduled medical visits to the primary care physician or ED was “virtually identical; 24 percent came back in the group that desaturated versus 26 percent that did not, so the difference was about 1.5 percent and that was neither clinically nor statistically significant. We also looked at the patients that had to be hospitalized after the initial discharge from the emergency department and that difference was also negligible.”

Among the 62 infants with desaturations who had diary information, 48 (77 percent) experienced them during sleep or while feeding, the investigators note.

“We need to figure out who we need to concentrate on in terms of [home pulse oximetry] monitoring. Are there special groups, because right now everyone is being monitored. I think we need to concentrate on the sicker patients in terms of monitoring as opposed to the ones who have relatively mild disease,” Dr. Schuh said.

The authors of a linked editorial say this study “places the issue of transient desaturations and their clinical importance at the forefront of the discussion around management of these patients. In addition, it adds to the dilemma of which patients should receive pulse oximetry in their evaluation and how to interpret the values.”

“Pulse oximetry has undoubtedly contributed to improved quality and safety of pediatric care, as these boxes have become a fixture at virtually every hospital bedside during recent decades. For bronchiolitis, however, some may view the oximeter as a Pandora’s box that was opened before the research had been done to appropriately interpret this stream of data. This has led to arbitrary thresholds for oxygen implementation and widespread use of continuous pulse oximetry,” write Dr. Lalit Bajaj of Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, and Dr. Joseph Zorc of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

“With this study,” they add, “we now have a clearer view” that transient hypoxemia events likely occur in many infants with bronchiolitis “and are not associated with apparent negative outcomes. Incorporating this information into clinical practice will require health care professionals to take a more judicious approach to the use of pulse oximetry in the evaluation of the patient. The evidence points to a clinical evaluation that incorporates oxygen saturation into the decision making but does not absolutely determine disposition. The time has come to stop focusing on the numbers on Pandora’s box and to develop strategies to thoughtfully use the data it provides us in the overall clinical care of the patient.”

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: BronchiolitisClinicalinfantsPediatricsPulse OximetryRespiratory Distress

Related

  • FACEPs in the Crowd: Dr. John Ludlow

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Department Management of Prehospital Tourniquets

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Value of Home Pulse Oximetry in Mild Bronchiolitis Questioned”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

Polls

Which topic would you like to see ACEP Now tackle?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603