Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Legal
      • Operations
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Compensation Reports
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • By the Numbers
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • mTBI Resource Center
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • Issue Archives
  • Archives
    • Brief19
    • Coding Wizard
    • Images in EM
    • Care Team
    • Quality & Safety
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Thrombus Aspiration Does Not Improve Standard Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes

By Will Boggs MD (Reuters Health) | on January 7, 2016 | 0 Comment
Latest News
Share:  Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Ron Waksman from MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, agreed. He told Reuters Health by email, “Aspiration still may have a value in certain conditions, which is hard to include in an all-comers study. But it should not be used routinely either in STEMI or NSTEMI patients.”

You Might Also Like
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Can Benefit Some at Age 90 and Older
  • Using Electronic Medical Records to Predict Readmission Risk After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Pay-for-Performance Programs Do Not Improve Health Outcomes

He added that this study “was underpowered to detect differences.”

Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium, Alliance of Daiichi Sankyo Germany GmbH, Munich, and Lilly Germany GmbH, Bad Homburg funded this research. The authors reported no disclosures.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: CardiovascularCritical CareMyocardial InfarctionSTEMIThrombectomy

Related

  • Phenylephrine and Epinephrine Push-Dose Vasopressors

    February 10, 2026 - 0 Comment
  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Read More

No Responses to “Thrombus Aspiration Does Not Improve Standard Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*



Current Issue

ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Read More

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603