Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Legal
      • Operations
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Compensation Reports
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • By the Numbers
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • mTBI Resource Center
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • Issue Archives
  • Archives
    • Brief19
    • Coding Wizard
    • Images in EM
    • Care Team
    • Quality & Safety
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

TAVR Tied to Superior Survival Compared with SAVR in Intermediate-Risk Patients

By Marilynn Larkin (Reuters Health) | on August 31, 2016 | 0 Comment
Uncategorized
Share:  Print-Friendly Version

At the American College of Cardiology meeting next year, Dr. Reardon hopes to present results from the SurTAVI trial, in which intermediate-risk patients have been randomly assigned to SAVR or TAVR using the CoreValve system.

You Might Also Like
  • COPD Risk Scale Identifies High-risk Patients in the Emergency Department
  • Macrolide Antibiotics Not Tied to Higher Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk in Older Adults
  • Restarting Antithrombotics After Gastrointestinal Bleeding Tied to Better Outcomes

Dr. Allan Stewart, director of Aortic Surgery and co-director of the Valve Center at The Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, told Reuters Health by email that the clinical implication of the study “is massive.”

He explained, “This study adds support to other multi-center trials, proving that intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis do better with TAVR than with traditional open-heart surgery. This study comes at an appropriate time point, as the FDA just approved the Edwards SAPIEN device for intermediate-risk patients. I suspect that approval for the Medtronic device will soon follow.”

Medtronic funded The CoreValve US Pivotal High Risk Trial. Dr. Reardon and 11 coauthors receive fees or grant support from Medtronic.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: CoreValve US Pivotal High-Risk TrialsSAVRSevere Aortic StenosisSociety of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of MortalitySTS PROMSurgical Aortic Valve ReplacementTAVRTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementUS Partner A Trials

Current Issue

ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Read More

No Responses to “TAVR Tied to Superior Survival Compared with SAVR in Intermediate-Risk Patients”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*



Current Issue

ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Read More

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603