Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Vitamin C Not a Magical Cure for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

By Jeremy Samuel Faust, MD, MS, MA, FACEP | on February 4, 2020 | 5 Comments
Latest News
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

As before, the mainstream media covered this story. National Public Radio, which widely publicized the protocol in 2017, again took notice. Dr. Marik told NPR that “in his experience, the treatment is only effective if given within six hours after someone has suspected sepsis.” (The typical time-to-treatment with the cocktail was around 12 hours in the VITAMINS trial.) But this is simply another way of saying that early detection and treatment of severe sepsis and shock are important. The patients for whom Dr. Marik declares the protocol is effective are precisely the ones receiving timely treatments we know to be crucial, including antibiotics and, in some patients, fluids and vasopressors. It is safe to propose that for patients who do not receive these proven therapies promptly, nothing will work later. However, in the VITAMINS trial, that is not what occurred. Instead, all patients received antibiotics prior to randomization. Nor do we know how quickly patients received either antibiotics or the vitamin C cocktail in the Marik study, as these data were not reported. However, the authors of the VITAMINS trial have already indicated that a subgroup analysis that takes time-to-treatment into account may be forthcoming.

You Might Also Like
  • Sepsis and Septic Shock Get New International Consensus Definitions
  • Should Prevention Methods for Sepsis Include IV Hydrocortisone?
  • Pearls from Emergency Medicine Literature on Skin Conditions, Sepsis, Chest Pain, and More
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 39 – No 02 – February 2020

Eighteen other studies assessing this cocktail are under way. With that many trials, each with its own patient inclusion criteria and unique outcome measurements, one of them is bound to find some signal of benefit by chance alone. But based on the VITAMINS study, I believe we can conclude that this miracle cure is not to be. If benefit is uncovered by any of these subsequent trials, it is likely to be small and incremental at best. Knowing that, we must again widen our perspective in our continued search for therapies that can truly turn the tide against sepsis.

References

  1. Marik PE, Khangoora V, Rivera R, et al. Hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective before-after study. Chest. 2017;151(6):1229-1238.
  2. Fujii T, Luethi N, Young PJ, et al. Effect of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine vs hydrocortisone alone on time alive and free of vasopressor support among patients with septic shock: the VITAMINS randomized clinical trial [published online ahead of print Jan. 17, 2020]. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.22176.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: SepsisSeptic ShockVitamin C

Related

  • Discharge Tachycardia: Remember the Big 4 and Don’t Play with Fire

    May 8, 2025 - 2 Comments
  • Case Report: Murine Typhus Presents as Severe Pneumonia and Sepsis

    February 19, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • 2024 Emergency Medicine Research Highlights: Forced Air, Sepsis, and More

    January 5, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

Jeremy Samuel Faust, MD, MS, MA, FACEP

Jeremy Samuel Faust, MD, MS, MA, FACEP, is Medical Editor in Chief of ACEP Now, an instructor at Harvard Medical School and an attending physician in department of emergency medicine at Brigham & Women’s Hospital in Boston. Follow him on twitter @JeremyFaust.

View this author's posts »

5 Responses to “Vitamin C Not a Magical Cure for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock”

  1. February 5, 2020

    Don Sprague Reply

    How convenient- no one to blame, yet somehow Dr Mariks’ protocol is not followed and lives are lost. Shame shame shame!
    There is no question- Dr Marik and his team are saving many lives. If you can not follow his protocol exactly, you should not pretend that this is a valid trial. It is obvious that “big pharma” will try anything to discredit Dr Marik as he is a threat to their profit machine.

    • September 2, 2020

      Troy Reply

      Yes – saving lots of Covid lives from Covid sepsis. Dr Faust is the Quack’s Quack.

  2. April 9, 2020

    Gary Hubbard Reply

    As Dr.Maric emphasized the protocol must be started immediately not the close to 15 hrs. after emission. Designed to fail. That is really sad!

  3. May 11, 2020

    Lisa Poast Reply

    As stated on page 3 of this article…

    Dr. Marik stated that “in his experience, the treatment is only effective if given within six hours after someone has suspected sepsis.”

    And you state here that the “typical time-to-treatment with the cocktail was around 12 hours in the VITAMINS trial.”

    My husband and I have read and listened to everything available online about the Marik protocol and VITAMINS study over the last couple of months, as well as Alpha A. Fowler, MD’s work that inspired the Marik protocol. We have agreed that if one of us becomes seriously ill and is at risk for septic shock, we will request the Marik protocol.

    I concur with others who have commented here. The study was designed to fail.

  4. September 2, 2020

    Troy Reply

    Dr Faust is the Quack’s quack. The Marik Protocol is now the MATH+ protocol saving thousands of Covid patients

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603