Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Ultrasound Image Quality

By ACEP Now | on April 1, 2011 | 0 Comment
CME CME Now
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Learning Objectives

After reading this article, the physician should be able to:

You Might Also Like
  • Bedside Ultrasound of the Abdominal Aorta
  • Bedside Biliary Ultrasound
  • Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasound
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 30 – No 04 – April 2011
  • Improve the quality of the ultrasound image by selecting the appropriate settings on the ultrasound machine, changing patient positioning, and utilizing sonographic windows.
  • Identify tissues and structures that degrade ultrasound image quality.

Difficulty in obtaining adequate sonographic images is a challenge for many emergency physicians and can be a major hindrance to incorporating ultrasound into clinical practice.

Ultrasound waves are poorly transmitted through air and adipose tissue, and are reflected by bone. For this reason, visualization of structures within the thoracic cage, the peritoneal cavity, or adjacent to the bony skeleton may be compromised.

This article will review simple approaches such as probe selection, image-enhancing settings of the machine, patient position changes, and the utilization of sonographic windows that contribute to image quality and the sensitivity of ultrasound examinations.

Emergency physicians encounter many challenging patient scenarios, including large body habitus, limited mobility, the patient in pain, and others. Nonetheless, in almost all cases, simply pressing a button on the machine, switching to a different probe, or changing the patient’s position is all that is necessary to improve image quality.

Probe

A probe (Fig. 1) with low frequency (2-5 MHz), such as a curvilinear probe, enables greater tissue penetration at the expense of anatomic image resolution.

A probe with higher frequency (5-8 MHz), such as a linear array probe, offers better detail but only to superficial structures. Simply stated, high-frequency probes are used to visualize in better detail superficial structures, such as peripheral vessels and soft tissue foreign bodies.

Low-frequency probes can be used to visualize deep structures, such as the aorta or gallbladder, but do not provide fine detail.

Many probes will have the frequency they use represented as a range. These “multifrequency” probes are commonly used in the emergency department because they are the most versatile. Setting a multifrequency probe to the lower part of its frequency range can be done for larger patients, and using the upper range of frequency can be done for smaller patients (Fig. 2).

The probe footprint ranges in shape and should be selected based on the clinical application. A linear array probe sends waves down in parallel lines, creating a rectangular image on the screen, whereas a phased-array probe creates a fan-shaped image.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: Abdominal and GastrointestinalCardiovascularClinical ExamCMEEducationEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianImaging and UltrasoundProcedures and SkillsQualityTechnologyTrauma and Injury

Related

  • Florida Emergency Department Adds Medication-Dispensing Kiosk

    November 7, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • FACEPs in the Crowd: Dr. John Ludlow

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP4U: the ACEP/CORD Teaching Fellowship

    November 4, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Ultrasound Image Quality”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603