Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Treatment of Epistaxis

By ACEP Now | on June 1, 2009 | 0 Comment
CME CME Now
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The association between hypertension and epistaxis is complicated. Hypertension does not cause epistaxis but may prolong it. Therapy focuses on control of the hemorrhage rather than reduction of the blood pressure. Analgesia and mild sedation are preferable to antihypertensive therapy.

You Might Also Like
  • Is Topical Tranexamic Acid Better Than Nasal Packing for Anterior Epistaxis?
  • Coding Wizard: How to Code Nosebleeds
  • ‘Flus’ and ‘Ooze’
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 28 – No 06 – June 2009

For patients with severe or recurrent hemorrhage or underlying medical conditions, a complete blood count should be performed, as well as a type and screen. In selected patients, such as those taking warfarin or with hepatic or renal dysfunction, coagulation studies are warranted.

No matter the choice of treatment, the patient should be observed for at least 1 hour after control. Encourage the patient to walk or perform other activities that he or she will need to resume when returning home.

Follow-up instructions include stopping aspirin and NSAIDs for a few days. In the patient treated by cautery, Vaseline or a similar moisturizing agent should be applied liberally in the nose three times a day for 7-10 days to promote healing of friable mucosa and superficial vessels. For the patient with a nasal pack, prescribe analgesics for comfort and arrange ENT follow-up in 3 days.

The role of prophylactic systemic antibiotics in patients who have nasal packs is not well established with wide variations in practice. Although studies to date do not directly address the issue, having been done primarily in patients with postsurgical packing, most sources recommend TMP/SMX, cephalexin, or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid to prevent sinusitis and toxic shock syndrome.

All patients requiring a posterior pack should be admitted because of the risk of airway obstruction and subsequent hypoxemia and dysrhythmias. Supplemental oxygen is administered once the pack is placed. Patients who have sustained significant blood loss or who have abnormal vital signs or concerning comorbidities, including coagulopathies, should be hospitalized. Finally, those with refractory epistaxis despite the above measures are admitted for vessel ligation or selective arterial embolization.

In the past several years, there has been a significant expansion in the number of options available to treat epistaxis. Traditional strategies such as nasal packs have been supplemented by the modern technology of hemostatic agents producing less patient discomfort, improved efficacy, fewer complications, and reduced requirement for emergent ENT consultation.

Contributors

Dr. Gilman is an assistant professor in the division of emergency medicine at Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Medical Editor Dr. Robert C. Solomon is an attending emergency physician at Trinity Health System in Steubenville, Ohio, and clinical assistant professor of emergency medicine at the West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Topics: CME

Related

  • Check Out ACEP’s Latest On-Demand CME Courses

    October 25, 2021 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP20 Access Continues, New Option Available for Non-Attendees

    December 15, 2020 - 0 Comment
  • The ACEP20 Virtual Package Is Now Available

    November 18, 2020 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Treatment of Epistaxis”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603