Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Treating Acute Pulmonary Embolism with EKOS and the Inari FlowTriever

By Ghida Ghanim, MD; and Robert McArthur, MD | on December 7, 2024 | 0 Comment
Annals of Emergency Medicine Features Pain & Palliative Care Policy Rx
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Complications, Limitations

Although some studies have shown promising safety profiles for these interventions, more robust trials are needed as these techniques still carry complications such as access site bleeding, arrhythmias, pulmonary artery dissection, and tamponade.12 In addition to complications, limitations to the implementation of EKOS and Inari FlowTriever include the fact that use requires technical expertise to navigate pulmonary vasculature and resources that not every facility is equipped with.7 Aside from equipment and device costs, use of these therapies usually requires multidisciplinary involvement from specialties like pulmonology, interventional cardiology, vascular surgery, interventional radiology, and more, to which smaller institutions may not have access.

You Might Also Like
  • Outpatient Management of Pulmonary Embolism
  • ACEP Clinical Policy Review: Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
  • A Rational Approach to Pulmonary Embolism Evaluation
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 12 – December 2024

The clinical presentation and effect of acute PE are highly variable and make management decisions, which include weighing risks and benefits of certain interventions, difficult and complex. How and whether to perform a catheter-based intervention is a multidisciplinary decision initiated in the emergency department, which factors in the patients’ clinical picture, bleeding risk, available personnel, expertise, and devices. Targeted approaches such as EKOS and Inari FlowTriever, appear promising because they reduce bleeding complications by lowering or eliminating the overall systemic dose of the thrombolytic delivered.

Given the rapid ability to restore favorable hemodynamics with catheter-directed intervention for PE, patients who display signs of RV dysfunction, myocardial injury, severe hypoxia, or hemodynamic instability are now considered for early intervention using these methods. Furthermore, these techniques provide a useful alternative in patients who fail systemic thrombolysis or those with relative or absolute contraindications to thrombolysis. Although the popularity of these techniques has grown, limitations of their clinical use must still be considered. With more devices and techniques being developed and approved for use in managing PE, it remains important to continue exploring their efficacy, accessibility, and safety profiles.


Dr. Ghanim is a third-year emergency medicine resident physician at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston,Texas.

 

 

 

Dr. McArthur is a board-certified emergency medicine physician and assistant professor at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas.

References

  1. Silver MJ, Giri J, Duffy Á, et al. Incidence of mortality and complications in high-risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023;2(1):100548.
  2. Shah IK, Merfeld JM, Chun J, et al. Pathophysiology and management of pulmonary embolism. Int J Angiol. 2022;31(3):143-149.
  3. Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T, et al. Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1402-1411.
  4. Mathbout MF, Al Hennawi H, Khedr A, et al. Inari largebore mechanical thrombectomy in intermediate-high risk submassive PE patients: case series and literature review. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2022;2022(1-2):e202208.
  5. Bloomer TL, El-Hayek GE, McDaniel MC, et al. Safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis for massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89(4):754-760.
  6. Piazza G, Hohlfelder B, Jaff MR, et al. A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed, low-dose fibrinolysis for acute massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: the SEATTLE II study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(10):1382-1392.
  7. Khan K, Yamamura D, Vargas C, et al. The role of Eko-Sonic Endovascular System or EKOS® in pulmonary embolism. Cureus. 2019;11(12):e6380.
  8. Wang C, Zhai Z, Yang Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of low dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for the treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism: a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial. Chest. 2010;137(2):254-262.
  9. Capanegro J, Quinn E, Arndt M, et al. Successful removal of a life-threatening PE using the INARI flow triever device. Radiol Case Rep. 2021;16(7):1878-1881.
  10. Tu T, Toma C, Tapson VF, et al. A prospective, singlearm, multicenter trial of catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy for intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism: the FLARE study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(9):859-869.
  11. Callese TE, Moriarty JM, Maehara C, et al. Cost drivers in endovascular pulmonary embolism interventions. Clin Radiol. 2023;78(2):e143-e149.
  12. Mostafa A, Briasoulis A, Telila T, et al. Treatment of massive or submassive acute pulmonary embolism with catheter-directed thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(6):1014-1020.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Ekosonic Endovascular System (EKOS)Inari FlowTrieverPulmonary Embolism

Related

  • Case Report: Rare Pulmonary Embolism After Routine PIVC Insertion

    September 22, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Discharge Tachycardia: Remember the Big 4 and Don’t Play with Fire

    May 8, 2025 - 2 Comments
  • Anticoagulant Selection Is Cornerstone of Pulmonary Embolism Treatment

    March 11, 2025 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Treating Acute Pulmonary Embolism with EKOS and the Inari FlowTriever”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603