Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Legal
      • Operations
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Compensation Reports
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • By the Numbers
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • mTBI Resource Center
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • Issue Archives
  • Archives
    • Brief19
    • Coding Wizard
    • Images in EM
    • Care Team
    • Quality & Safety
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

When using Argyris’ Ladder of Inference, team members share the subset of data they used and how it was interpreted to make inferences, judgments, and conclusions. This focuses debate on data interpretation and the thought process that went into creating a recommendation. After taking action, new data inform future decisions.

By Joseph Harrington | on August 16, 2021 | 0 Comment
Share:  Print-Friendly Version

When using Argyris’ Ladder of Inference, team members share the subset of data they used and how it was interpreted to make inferences, judgments, and conclusions. This focuses debate on data interpretation and the thought process that went into creating a recommendation. After taking action, new data inform future decisions.

You Might Also Like
  • Tips for Productive Hospital Policy Discussions
  • ACEP’s Political Action Committee Is Insuring Emergency Medicine’s Future
  • ACEP’s stroke policy fuels discussion and debate

When using Argyris’ Ladder of Inference, team members share the subset of data they used and how it was interpreted to make inferences, judgments, and conclusions. This focuses debate on data interpretation and the thought process that went into creating a recommendation. After taking action, new data inform future decisions.

Current Issue

ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Read More

About the Author

Joseph Harrington

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “When using Argyris’ Ladder of Inference, team members share the subset of data they used and how it was interpreted to make inferences, judgments, and conclusions. This focuses debate on data interpretation and the thought process that went into creating a recommendation. After taking action, new data inform future decisions.”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*



Current Issue

ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Read More

Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603