Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Tips for Managing Weber B Ankle Fractures

By Joseph Noack, MD; and Spencer Tomberg, MD | on April 14, 2020 | 1 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Evaluation

When evaluating a Weber B fracture, if the initial imaging does not demonstrate obvious evidence of tibiotalar instability, ankle stress testing is indicated. There are three primary methods of performing an ankle stress test. These include manual, gravity, and weight-bearing techniques.

You Might Also Like
  • Tips for Managing Suspected Occult Fractures
  • Tips for Catching Commonly Missed Ankle Injuries
  • Tips for Diagnosing Occult Fractures in the Emergency Department
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 39 – No 04 – April 2020

Manual stress testing has historically been the method utilized to evaluate the stability of the ankle joint. This method involves keeping the ankle at neutral dorsiflexion, rotating the tibia internally at 10°, and applying 8 to 20 pounds of external rotation at the foot.3 This typically requires a physician going to the radiology suite to perform the stress test.

Figure 1: Optimal ankle positioning with gravity stress testing. Joseph Noack & Spencer Tomberg.

Gravity stress is typically performed with the patient lying in lateral decubitus with the injured side down, allowing the foot and ankle to create a lateral force across the ankle joint, with the foot resting in natural plantar flexion and the leg internally rotated at 10° to 15° (see Figure 1).6 Gravity stress has been shown to be as reliable and less painful than manual stress testing.6,7

Weight-bearing films are a relatively new method of testing for medial stability. Despite initial cadaveric studies demonstrating that weight-bearing films did not accurately provide radiographic evidence of instability, recent clinical studies have shown that weight-bearing radiographs are predictive of stability and that gravity stress radiographs likely overestimate the instability, resulting in up to a tenfold increase in surgeries when a medial clear space (MCS) cutoff of 4 mm is used.8–11 One recent study compared patients who had a borderline unstable ankle based on gravity stress imaging (MCS 4–7 mm) but stability on the weight-bearing imaging to patients who had a stable ankle based on gravity and weight-bearing imaging. There was no functional outcome difference between the two cohorts of patients who elected to be managed nonoperatively.10 The most compelling argument for weight-bearing films is that they stress the ankle joint under physiological conditions that measure stability under realistic and reproducible conditions.

Figure 2: Normal ankle mortise view with demonstrated medial clear space (MCS) and superior clear space (SCS).

Figure 2: Normal ankle mortise view with demonstrated medial clear space (MCS) and superior clear space (SCS).
Joseph Noack & Spencer Tomberg

Like gravity stress imaging, weight-bearing films can be performed by a radiology technician without physician assistance. The weight-bearing technique is more reproducible and takes less radiology technician training than either gravity stress or manual stress views.10 However, from an emergency medicine perspective, one of the most glaring questions is whether patients with an acutely injured ankle can bear enough weight to get adequate radiographs, as the studies comparing stress techniques have been completed in orthopedic clinics three to 10 days after the initial injury. We could not find data pertaining to this particular question.

MRI can be used to evaluate the deltoid ligament, but the degree of the tear does not always equate to instability on stress radiographs.12

Specific parameters are evaluated in each stress view of the ankle. For gravity stress views, consensus is leaning to a value for the MCS of <7 mm to define a stable ankle joint. An MCS >4 mm is the historical value used to indicate operative management, but this value has been shown to lead to a high false-positive rate and unnecessary surgeries, of which 10 percent have surgical complications.13,14 An MCS greater than the superior clear space (SCS) of 1 mm or more on mortise view is another sign of ankle instability (see Figure 2). Finally, if the injured side has an MCS that is >2 mm wider than the uninjured side, the ankle can be considered unstable. Any of these radiographic abnormalities on initial imaging suggest a clinically significant injury to the deltoid ligament and ankle instability.13 While the trend is toward adopting the 6 mm threshold for MCS, there is no consensus among orthopedic surgeons and your consultant may use stricter guidelines.6,13

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: AnklefractureWeber ankle fractures

Related

  • Patterns of Injury in Elder Abuse

    November 6, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Nail Bed Injuries: What to Do—or Not to Do

    August 18, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Occult and Subtle Wrist and Hand Injuries You Don’t Want To Miss

    March 15, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

One Response to “Tips for Managing Weber B Ankle Fractures”

  1. May 19, 2020

    Huda Naeem Reply

    Is there an app for this ACEPNOW?

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603